On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 09:32:20AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 14.09.2022 09:11, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 08:44:25AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> On 14.09.2022 08:40, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 08:36:02AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>>
On 14.09.2022 09:11, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 08:44:25AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 14.09.2022 08:40, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 08:36:02AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 13.09.2022 19:22, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13,
On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 08:44:25AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 14.09.2022 08:40, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 08:36:02AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> On 13.09.2022 19:22, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 04:47:24PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>>
On 14.09.2022 08:40, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 08:36:02AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 13.09.2022 19:22, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 04:47:24PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 13.09.2022 16:22, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06,
On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 08:36:02AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 13.09.2022 19:22, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 04:47:24PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> On 13.09.2022 16:22, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 10:01:00AM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> >
On 13.09.2022 19:22, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 04:47:24PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 13.09.2022 16:22, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 10:01:00AM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 06/09/2022 10:52, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 02.09.2022 04:05,
On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 04:47:24PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 13.09.2022 16:22, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 10:01:00AM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> >> On 06/09/2022 10:52, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 02.09.2022 04:05, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> On Intel chips (I
On 13.09.2022 16:22, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 10:01:00AM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 06/09/2022 10:52, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 02.09.2022 04:05, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
On Intel chips (Ice Lake and later) and ARM64, a bit needs to be set in
a CPU regis
On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 10:01:00AM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 06/09/2022 10:52, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > On 02.09.2022 04:05, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> >> On Intel chips (Ice Lake and later) and ARM64, a bit needs to be set in
> >> a CPU register to enforce constant-time execution. Linux pla
Hi Demi,
> On 2 Sep 2022, at 03:05, Demi Marie Obenour
> wrote:
>
> On Intel chips (Ice Lake and later) and ARM64, a bit needs to be set in
This bit would not change anything on Arm currently so nothing is required for
now (and nothing has been done in Linux for ARM64).
Thanks a lot for noti
On 06/09/2022 10:52, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 02.09.2022 04:05, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
>> On Intel chips (Ice Lake and later) and ARM64, a bit needs to be set in
>> a CPU register to enforce constant-time execution. Linux plans to set
>> this bit by default; Xen should do the same. See
>> https
On 02.09.2022 04:05, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> On Intel chips (Ice Lake and later) and ARM64, a bit needs to be set in
> a CPU register to enforce constant-time execution. Linux plans to set
> this bit by default; Xen should do the same. See
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ywgcrqutxmx0w...@gmail
12 matches
Mail list logo