On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 10:43:10AM -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 6:22 AM Joel Granados
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 03:42:39PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 04:55:58PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > > > You could have static const within fu
On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 6:22 AM Joel Granados wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 03:42:39PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 04:55:58PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > > You could have static const within functions too. You get the rodata
> > > protection and function local sco
On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 03:42:39PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 04:55:58PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > You could have static const within functions too. You get the rodata
> > protection and function local scope, best of both worlds?
>
> timer_active is on the stack, so
On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 04:55:58PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> You could have static const within functions too. You get the rodata
> protection and function local scope, best of both worlds?
timer_active is on the stack, so it can't be static const.
Does this really need to be cc'd to such a wid
On Mon, 27 Jan 2025, Joel Granados wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 01:41:35PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 at 13:25, Joel Granados wrote:
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 02:40:16PM +0100, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
>> > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 03:16:08PM +0100, Joel Gran
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 01:41:35PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 at 13:25, Joel Granados wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 02:40:16PM +0100, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 03:16:08PM +0100, Joel Granados wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Joel,
> > >
> > > > Ad
