On 10.01.23 10:38, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 10.01.2023 06:59, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 10.01.23 06:47, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 09.01.23 19:28, Michael Kelley (LINUX) wrote:
I've come across a case with a VM running on Hyper-V that doesn't get
MTRRs, but the PAT is functional. (This is a Confident
On 10.01.2023 06:59, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 10.01.23 06:47, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 09.01.23 19:28, Michael Kelley (LINUX) wrote:
>>> I've come across a case with a VM running on Hyper-V that doesn't get
>>> MTRRs, but the PAT is functional. (This is a Confidential VM using
>>> AMD's SEV-SNP
On 10.01.23 06:47, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 09.01.23 19:28, Michael Kelley (LINUX) wrote:
I've come across a case with a VM running on Hyper-V that doesn't get
MTRRs, but the PAT is functional. (This is a Confidential VM using
AMD's SEV-SNP encryption technology with the vTOM option.) In this
c
On 09.01.23 19:28, Michael Kelley (LINUX) wrote:
I've come across a case with a VM running on Hyper-V that doesn't get
MTRRs, but the PAT is functional. (This is a Confidential VM using
AMD's SEV-SNP encryption technology with the vTOM option.) In this
case, the changes in commit 72cbc8f04fe2 (
