On 20.05.2022 14:37, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 08:24:48AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 20.05.2022 01:22, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
>>> It is well known that mapping and unmapping grants is expensive, which
>>> is why blkback has persistent grants. Could this cost be mi
On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 08:24:48AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 20.05.2022 01:22, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> > It is well known that mapping and unmapping grants is expensive, which
> > is why blkback has persistent grants. Could this cost be mitigated by
> > batching, and if it was, would it a
On 20.05.2022 01:22, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> It is well known that mapping and unmapping grants is expensive, which
> is why blkback has persistent grants. Could this cost be mitigated by
> batching, and if it was, would it affect the tradeoff of memcpy() vs
> grant table operations?
Which ba
