Re: Discussion on unexpected behavior of ARINC653 scheduler

2025-04-04 Thread Choi, Anderson
Andrew, > EXT email: be mindful of links/attachments. > > On 13/03/2025 9:27 am, Choi, Anderson wrote: >> May I know when you think it would be mainlined? And will it be applied to > all branches, like 4.19 and 4.20? > > FYI, backports of this and the xfree() bug have just happened, back to 4.18

Re: Discussion on unexpected behavior of ARINC653 scheduler

2025-03-20 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 13/03/2025 9:27 am, Choi, Anderson wrote: > May I know when you think it would be mainlined? And will it be applied to > all branches, like 4.19 and 4.20? FYI, backports of this and the xfree() bug have just happened, back to 4.18. ~Andrew

Re: Discussion on unexpected behavior of ARINC653 scheduler

2025-03-13 Thread Jürgen Groß
On 13.03.25 10:27, Choi, Anderson wrote: Juergen, On 13.03.25 07:51, Choi, Anderson wrote: We are observing an incorrect or unexpected behavior with ARINC653 scheduler when we set up multiple ARINC653 CPU pools and assign a different number of domains to each CPU pool. ... It seems there's

RE: Discussion on unexpected behavior of ARINC653 scheduler

2025-03-13 Thread Choi, Anderson
Juergen, > On 13.03.25 07:51, Choi, Anderson wrote: >> We are observing an incorrect or unexpected behavior with ARINC653 > scheduler when we set up multiple ARINC653 CPU pools and assign a > different number of domains to each CPU pool. > > ... > >> It seems there's a corner condition in using

Re: Discussion on unexpected behavior of ARINC653 scheduler

2025-03-13 Thread Juergen Gross
On 13.03.25 07:51, Choi, Anderson wrote: We are observing an incorrect or unexpected behavior with ARINC653 scheduler when we set up multiple ARINC653 CPU pools and assign a different number of domains to each CPU pool. ... It seems there's a corner condition in using the global variables "