Re: [Xen-devel] tools/fuzz fails due build, osstest did not notice

2018-09-21 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 20.09.18 at 20:19, wrote: > I've just encountered this problem, building with the master branch of > OpenEmbedded and Yocto's poky, with compiler flags that include > _FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -msse3 > with gcc 8.2.0. > > Xen's x86_emulator header file does: > #pragma GCC target("no-sse")

Re: [Xen-devel] tools/fuzz fails due build, osstest did not notice

2018-09-20 Thread Christopher Clark
On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 2:07 AM Jan Beulich wrote: > > >>> On 04.09.18 at 09:32, wrote: > > Am Mon, 03 Sep 2018 06:35:42 -0600 > > schrieb "Jan Beulich" : > > > >> what is the actual problem? The mere > >> listing of compiler flags passed does not make clear to me where the clash > >> is, or how i

Re: [Xen-devel] tools/fuzz fails due build, osstest did not notice

2018-09-04 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 04.09.18 at 09:32, wrote: > Am Mon, 03 Sep 2018 06:35:42 -0600 > schrieb "Jan Beulich" : > >> what is the actual problem? The mere >> listing of compiler flags passed does not make clear to me where the clash >> is, or how it would surface. > > As I noticed just now, it fails to build onl

Re: [Xen-devel] tools/fuzz fails due build, osstest did not notice

2018-09-04 Thread Olaf Hering
Am Mon, 03 Sep 2018 06:35:42 -0600 schrieb "Jan Beulich" : > what is the actual problem? The mere > listing of compiler flags passed does not make clear to me where the clash > is, or how it would surface. As I noticed just now, it fails to build only in Tumbleweed. So in this specific case osst

Re: [Xen-devel] tools/fuzz fails due build, osstest did not notice

2018-09-03 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 03.09.18 at 11:53, wrote: > Since about two months staging fails to build because tools/fuzz can not cope > with CFLAGS="-O2 -Wall -fstack-protector-strong -funwind-tables > -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection". While I can easily > hide the bug by undefining _FORTIFY_