>>> On 04.10.18 at 13:58, wrote:
> On 26/09/18 08:42, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> @@ -1630,6 +1646,66 @@ static void svm_init_erratum_383(const s
>> }
>> }
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PV
>> +bool svm_load_segs(unsigned int ldt_ents, unsigned long ldt_base,
>> + unsigned int fs_sel, un
On 26/09/18 08:42, Jan Beulich wrote:
> @@ -1630,6 +1646,66 @@ static void svm_init_erratum_383(const s
> }
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PV
> +bool svm_load_segs(unsigned int ldt_ents, unsigned long ldt_base,
> + unsigned int fs_sel, unsigned long fs_base,
> +
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 01:42:09AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Having noticed that VMLOAD alone is about as fast as a single of the
> involved WRMSRs, I thought it might be a reasonable idea to also use it
> for PV. Measurements, however, have shown that an actual improvement can
> be achieved only
