On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 05:00:57PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > As Christoph didn't react when I posted possible solutions I think I'll
> > just modify patch 3 according to Jan's comment and post V3.
>
> OK, will await that patchset. Thank you!
>
> BTW, your patch #1 should be upstream
> >
> > #2 patch says:
> >
> > "> To be symmetric with setting the flag only after having made the
> > region
> > > contiguous, and to avoid (perhaps just theoretical) races, wouldn't
> > it be
> > > better to clear the flag before calling
> > xen_destroy_contiguous_region()?
> >
On 13.06.19 16:23, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 04:24:06PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 05.06.19 16:13, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 03:41:40PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
On 6/4/19 12:51 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Mon, 3 Jun 2019, Bor
On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 04:24:06PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 05.06.19 16:13, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 03:41:40PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> > > On 6/4/19 12:51 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 3 Jun 2019, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> > > > > On 6
On 05.06.19 16:13, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 03:41:40PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
On 6/4/19 12:51 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Mon, 3 Jun 2019, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
On 6/3/19 2:25 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Tue, 28 May 2019, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
O
On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 03:41:40PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 6/4/19 12:51 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Mon, 3 Jun 2019, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> >> On 6/3/19 2:25 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 28 May 2019, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 5/28/19 6:48 PM, Stefano Stab
On 6/4/19 12:51 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Jun 2019, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> On 6/3/19 2:25 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>> On Tue, 28 May 2019, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
On 5/28/19 6:48 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> From: Stefano Stabellini
>
> On arm64 swiotlb
On Mon, 3 Jun 2019, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 6/3/19 2:25 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 May 2019, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> >> On 5/28/19 6:48 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> >>> From: Stefano Stabellini
> >>>
> >>> On arm64 swiotlb is often (not always) already initialized by mem_
On 6/3/19 2:25 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 28 May 2019, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> On 5/28/19 6:48 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>> From: Stefano Stabellini
>>>
>>> On arm64 swiotlb is often (not always) already initialized by mem_init.
>>> We don't want to initialize it twice, which w
On Tue, 28 May 2019, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 5/28/19 6:48 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > From: Stefano Stabellini
> >
> > On arm64 swiotlb is often (not always) already initialized by mem_init.
> > We don't want to initialize it twice, which would trigger a second
> > memory allocation. Mor
On 5/28/19 6:48 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> From: Stefano Stabellini
>
> On arm64 swiotlb is often (not always) already initialized by mem_init.
> We don't want to initialize it twice, which would trigger a second
> memory allocation. Moreover, the second memory pool is typically made of
> hig
11 matches
Mail list logo
