Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH MM-PART2 RESEND v2 04/19] xen/arm: Rework HSCTLR_BASE

On Tue, 4 Jun 2019, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi Stefano, > > On 6/4/19 12:12 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > On Wed, 29 May 2019, Julien Grall wrote: > > > Ping, it would be good to know which bits I dropped... > > > > > > On 21/05/2019 11:09, Julien Grall wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > On 5/

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH MM-PART2 RESEND v2 04/19] xen/arm: Rework HSCTLR_BASE

Hi Stefano, On 6/4/19 12:12 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: On Wed, 29 May 2019, Julien Grall wrote: Ping, it would be good to know which bits I dropped... On 21/05/2019 11:09, Julien Grall wrote: Hi, On 5/20/19 11:56 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: On Tue, 14 May 2019, Julien Grall wrote: The

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH MM-PART2 RESEND v2 04/19] xen/arm: Rework HSCTLR_BASE

On Wed, 29 May 2019, Julien Grall wrote: > Ping, it would be good to know which bits I dropped... > > On 21/05/2019 11:09, Julien Grall wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 5/20/19 11:56 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > On Tue, 14 May 2019, Julien Grall wrote: > > > > The current value of HSCTLR_BASE for

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH MM-PART2 RESEND v2 04/19] xen/arm: Rework HSCTLR_BASE

On 21.05.19 13:09, Julien Grall wrote: Hi, On 5/20/19 11:56 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: On Tue, 14 May 2019, Julien Grall wrote: The current value of HSCTLR_BASE for Arm64 is pretty wrong. It would actually turn on SCTLR_EL2.nAA (bit 6) on hardware implementing ARMv8.4-LSE. Furthermore, t

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH MM-PART2 RESEND v2 04/19] xen/arm: Rework HSCTLR_BASE

Ping, it would be good to know which bits I dropped... On 21/05/2019 11:09, Julien Grall wrote: Hi, On 5/20/19 11:56 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: On Tue, 14 May 2019, Julien Grall wrote: The current value of HSCTLR_BASE for Arm64 is pretty wrong. It would actually turn on SCTLR_EL2.nAA (bit

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH MM-PART2 RESEND v2 04/19] xen/arm: Rework HSCTLR_BASE

Hi, On 5/20/19 11:56 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: On Tue, 14 May 2019, Julien Grall wrote: The current value of HSCTLR_BASE for Arm64 is pretty wrong. It would actually turn on SCTLR_EL2.nAA (bit 6) on hardware implementing ARMv8.4-LSE. Furthermore, the documentation of what is cleared/set in

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH MM-PART2 RESEND v2 04/19] xen/arm: Rework HSCTLR_BASE

On Tue, 14 May 2019, Julien Grall wrote: > The current value of HSCTLR_BASE for Arm64 is pretty wrong. It would > actually turn on SCTLR_EL2.nAA (bit 6) on hardware implementing > ARMv8.4-LSE. > > Furthermore, the documentation of what is cleared/set in SCTLR_EL2 is > also not correct and looks li