Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] tools/ocaml: Build fix following
libxl API changes"):
> According to osstest results accumulated over the weekend and the
> state of the tree, did you perhaps commit the change but forgot
> to actually push it?
Gah, apparently
On 20.09.2019 19:15, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Anthony PERARD writes ("Re: [PATCH] tools/ocaml: Build fix following libxl
> API changes"):
>> On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 05:19:02PM +0100, Anthony PERARD wrote:
>>> The following libxl API became asynchronous and gained an additional
>>> `ao_how' parameter:
On 20/09/2019 17:19, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> The following libxl API became asynchronous and gained an additional
> `ao_how' parameter:
> libxl_domain_pause()
> libxl_domain_unpause()
> libxl_send_trigger()
>
> Adapt the ocaml binding.
>
> Build tested only.
>
> Fixes: edaa631ddcee665cd
Anthony PERARD writes ("Re: [PATCH] tools/ocaml: Build fix following libxl API
changes"):
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 05:19:02PM +0100, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> > The following libxl API became asynchronous and gained an additional
> > `ao_how' parameter:
> > libxl_domain_pause()
> > libxl_do
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 05:19:02PM +0100, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> The following libxl API became asynchronous and gained an additional
> `ao_how' parameter:
> libxl_domain_pause()
> libxl_domain_unpause()
> libxl_send_trigger()
>
> Adapt the ocaml binding.
>
> Build tested only.
>
>
