On 06.07.2023 10:23, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
> On 04/07/23 17:57, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 29.06.2023 21:20, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>> On Thu, 29 Jun 2023, Luca Fancellu wrote:
> On 29 Jun 2023, at 11:06, Nicola Vetrini
> wrote:
> --- a/xen/common/xmalloc_tlsf.c
> +++ b/xen/comm
On 04/07/23 17:57, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 29.06.2023 21:20, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jun 2023, Luca Fancellu wrote:
On 29 Jun 2023, at 11:06, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
--- a/xen/common/xmalloc_tlsf.c
+++ b/xen/common/xmalloc_tlsf.c
@@ -140,9 +140,7 @@ static inline void MAPPING_SEARC
On 29.06.2023 21:20, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jun 2023, Luca Fancellu wrote:
>>> On 29 Jun 2023, at 11:06, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/common/xmalloc_tlsf.c
>>> +++ b/xen/common/xmalloc_tlsf.c
>>> @@ -140,9 +140,7 @@ static inline void MAPPING_SEARCH(unsigned long *r, int
>>
> On 29 Jun 2023, at 20:20, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>
> On Thu, 29 Jun 2023, Luca Fancellu wrote:
>>> On 29 Jun 2023, at 11:06, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
>>>
>>> In the files modified by this patch there are a few occurrences of nested
>>> '//'
>>> character sequences inside C-style comment bl
On Thu, 29 Jun 2023, Luca Fancellu wrote:
> > On 29 Jun 2023, at 11:06, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
> >
> > In the files modified by this patch there are a few occurrences of nested
> > '//'
> > character sequences inside C-style comment blocks, which violate Rule 3.1.
> > The patch aims to resolve th
> On 29 Jun 2023, at 11:06, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
>
> In the files modified by this patch there are a few occurrences of nested '//'
> character sequences inside C-style comment blocks, which violate Rule 3.1.
> The patch aims to resolve those by removing the nested comments.
>
> In the file '
