Re: [XEN PATCH v3 1/3] xen/arch/arm: fix violations of MISRA C:2012 Rule 3.1

2023-06-29 Thread Julien Grall
Hi, On 29/06/2023 20:11, Stefano Stabellini wrote: On Thu, 29 Jun 2023, Luca Fancellu wrote: On 29 Jun 2023, at 11:06, Nicola Vetrini wrote: In the files `xen/arch/arm/include/asm/arm(32|64)/flushtlb.h' there are a few occurrences of nested '//' character sequences inside C-style comment bloc

Re: [XEN PATCH v3 1/3] xen/arch/arm: fix violations of MISRA C:2012 Rule 3.1

2023-06-29 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Thu, 29 Jun 2023, Luca Fancellu wrote: > > On 29 Jun 2023, at 11:06, Nicola Vetrini wrote: > > > > In the files `xen/arch/arm/include/asm/arm(32|64)/flushtlb.h' there are a > > few occurrences of nested '//' character sequences inside C-style comment > > blocks, which violate Rule 3.1. The pat

Re: [XEN PATCH v3 1/3] xen/arch/arm: fix violations of MISRA C:2012 Rule 3.1

2023-06-29 Thread Nicola Vetrini
On 29/06/23 16:41, Luca Fancellu wrote: On 29 Jun 2023, at 11:06, Nicola Vetrini wrote: In the files `xen/arch/arm/include/asm/arm(32|64)/flushtlb.h' there are a few occurrences of nested '//' character sequences inside C-style comment blocks, which violate Rule 3.1. The patch aims to res

Re: [XEN PATCH v3 1/3] xen/arch/arm: fix violations of MISRA C:2012 Rule 3.1

2023-06-29 Thread Luca Fancellu
> On 29 Jun 2023, at 11:06, Nicola Vetrini wrote: > > In the files `xen/arch/arm/include/asm/arm(32|64)/flushtlb.h' there are a > few occurrences of nested '//' character sequences inside C-style comment > blocks, which violate Rule 3.1. The patch aims to resolve those by changing > the inner c