On 03.04.2020 17:13, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 03/04/2020 08:57, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 03.04.2020 01:12, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> On 24/03/2020 12:34, Jan Beulich wrote:
Introduce a new blk() hook, paralleling the rmw() on in certain way, but
being intended for larger data sizes, and h
On 03/04/2020 08:57, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 03.04.2020 01:12, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 24/03/2020 12:34, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> Introduce a new blk() hook, paralleling the rmw() on in certain way, but
>>> being intended for larger data sizes, and hence its HVM intermediate
>>> handling function
On 03.04.2020 01:12, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 24/03/2020 12:34, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Introduce a new blk() hook, paralleling the rmw() on in certain way, but
>> being intended for larger data sizes, and hence its HVM intermediate
>> handling function doesn't fall back to splitting the operation i
On 24/03/2020 12:34, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Introduce a new blk() hook, paralleling the rmw() on in certain way, but
> being intended for larger data sizes, and hence its HVM intermediate
> handling function doesn't fall back to splitting the operation if the
> requested virtual address can't be mapp
