On 29/08/2024 3:36 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 29.08.2024 00:03, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> +asm (
>> +".type arch_generic_hweightl, STT_FUNC\n\t"
>> +".globl arch_generic_hweightl\n\t"
>> +".hidden arch_generic_hweightl\n\t"
>> +".balign " STR(CONFIG_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT) ", 0x90\n\t"
>
On 02/09/2024 9:06 am, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 30.08.2024 22:03, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 29/08/2024 3:36 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 29.08.2024 00:03, Andrew Cooper wrote:
It has existed in x86 CPUs since 2008, so we're only 16 years late adding
support. With all the other scafoldin
On 30.08.2024 22:03, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 29/08/2024 3:36 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 29.08.2024 00:03, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> It has existed in x86 CPUs since 2008, so we're only 16 years late adding
>>> support. With all the other scafolding in place, implement arch_hweightl()
>>> for x8
On 29/08/2024 3:36 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 29.08.2024 00:03, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> It has existed in x86 CPUs since 2008, so we're only 16 years late adding
>> support. With all the other scafolding in place, implement arch_hweightl()
>> for x86.
>>
>> The only complication is that the call
On 29.08.2024 00:03, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> It has existed in x86 CPUs since 2008, so we're only 16 years late adding
> support. With all the other scafolding in place, implement arch_hweightl()
> for x86.
>
> The only complication is that the call to arch_generic_hweightl() is behind
> the compi
