Hi Jan,
> On 21 Apr 2021, at 10:33 am, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 21.04.2021 11:15, Rahul Singh wrote:
>> Hi Roger,
>>
>>> On 21 Apr 2021, at 9:16 am, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 08:07:08AM +, Rahul Singh wrote:
Hi Jan,
> On 20 Apr 2021, at 4:36 pm
On 21.04.2021 11:15, Rahul Singh wrote:
> Hi Roger,
>
>> On 21 Apr 2021, at 9:16 am, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 08:07:08AM +, Rahul Singh wrote:
>>> Hi Jan,
>>>
On 20 Apr 2021, at 4:36 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 20.04.2021 15:45, Rahul Singh wrote:
>>>
On 21.04.2021 10:16, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 08:07:08AM +, Rahul Singh wrote:
>> Hi Jan,
>>
>>> On 20 Apr 2021, at 4:36 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>
>>> On 20.04.2021 15:45, Rahul Singh wrote:
> On 19 Apr 2021, at 1:33 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 19.04.2021 13:5
Hi Roger,
> On 21 Apr 2021, at 9:16 am, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 08:07:08AM +, Rahul Singh wrote:
>> Hi Jan,
>>
>>> On 20 Apr 2021, at 4:36 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>
>>> On 20.04.2021 15:45, Rahul Singh wrote:
> On 19 Apr 2021, at 1:33 pm, Jan Beulich wrote
On 21.04.2021 10:07, Rahul Singh wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
>> On 20 Apr 2021, at 4:36 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>
>> On 20.04.2021 15:45, Rahul Singh wrote:
On 19 Apr 2021, at 1:33 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 19.04.2021 13:54, Julien Grall wrote:
> For the time being, I think move this code i
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 08:07:08AM +, Rahul Singh wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> > On 20 Apr 2021, at 4:36 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >
> > On 20.04.2021 15:45, Rahul Singh wrote:
> >>> On 19 Apr 2021, at 1:33 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 19.04.2021 13:54, Julien Grall wrote:
> For the time bei
Hi Jan,
> On 20 Apr 2021, at 4:36 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 20.04.2021 15:45, Rahul Singh wrote:
>>> On 19 Apr 2021, at 1:33 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 19.04.2021 13:54, Julien Grall wrote:
For the time being, I think move this code in x86 is a lot better than
#ifdef or keep t
On 20.04.2021 15:45, Rahul Singh wrote:
>> On 19 Apr 2021, at 1:33 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 19.04.2021 13:54, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> For the time being, I think move this code in x86 is a lot better than
>>> #ifdef or keep the code in common code.
>>
>> Well, I would perhaps agree if it ende
Hi Jan
> On 19 Apr 2021, at 1:33 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 19.04.2021 13:54, Julien Grall wrote:
>> For the time being, I think move this code in x86 is a lot better than
>> #ifdef or keep the code in common code.
>
> Well, I would perhaps agree if it ended up being #ifdef CONFIG_X86.
> I
On 19.04.2021 13:54, Julien Grall wrote:
> For the time being, I think move this code in x86 is a lot better than
> #ifdef or keep the code in common code.
Well, I would perhaps agree if it ended up being #ifdef CONFIG_X86.
I would perhaps not agree if there was a new CONFIG_* which other
(future
On 19/04/2021 12:16, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 19.04.2021 10:40, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 07:16:52AM +, Rahul Singh wrote:
Thanks you everyone for reviewing the code. I will summarise what I have
understood from all the comments
and what I will be doing for the next ve
On 19.04.2021 10:40, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 07:16:52AM +, Rahul Singh wrote:
>> Thanks you everyone for reviewing the code. I will summarise what I have
>> understood from all the comments
>> and what I will be doing for the next version of the patch. Please let me
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 07:16:52AM +, Rahul Singh wrote:
> Thanks you everyone for reviewing the code. I will summarise what I have
> understood from all the comments
> and what I will be doing for the next version of the patch. Please let me
> know your view on this.
>
> 1. Create a separ
Hi All,
> On 15 Apr 2021, at 2:31 pm, Julien Grall wrote:
>
> Hi Roger,
>
> On 15/04/2021 14:26, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 09:49:37AM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> Hi Roger,
>>>
>>> On 14/04/2021 09:05, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 06:12:10PM +01
Hi Roger,
On 15/04/2021 14:26, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 09:49:37AM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Roger,
On 14/04/2021 09:05, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 06:12:10PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Roger,
On 12/04/2021 11:49, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On F
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 09:49:37AM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Roger,
>
> On 14/04/2021 09:05, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 06:12:10PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> > > Hi Roger,
> > >
> > > On 12/04/2021 11:49, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 05:00
Hi Roger,
On 14/04/2021 09:05, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 06:12:10PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Roger,
On 12/04/2021 11:49, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 05:00:41PM +0100, Rahul Singh wrote:
diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/pci.c b/xen/drivers/pass
On 14.04.2021 10:28, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 09:08:53AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 13.04.2021 19:12, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> On 12/04/2021 11:49, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 05:00:41PM +0100, Rahul Singh wrote:
> --- a/xen/include/xen/vpci.h
Hi Jan,
On 14/04/2021 08:08, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 13.04.2021 19:12, Julien Grall wrote:
On 12/04/2021 11:49, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 05:00:41PM +0100, Rahul Singh wrote:
--- a/xen/include/xen/vpci.h
+++ b/xen/include/xen/vpci.h
@@ -91,6 +91,7 @@ struct vpci {
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 09:08:53AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 13.04.2021 19:12, Julien Grall wrote:
> > On 12/04/2021 11:49, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >> On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 05:00:41PM +0100, Rahul Singh wrote:
> >>> --- a/xen/include/xen/vpci.h
> >>> +++ b/xen/include/xen/vpci.h
> >>> @@ -9
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 06:12:10PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Roger,
>
> On 12/04/2021 11:49, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 05:00:41PM +0100, Rahul Singh wrote:
> > > diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/pci.c b/xen/drivers/passthrough/pci.c
> > > index 705137f8be..1b4735
On 13.04.2021 19:12, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 12/04/2021 11:49, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 05:00:41PM +0100, Rahul Singh wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/include/xen/vpci.h
>>> +++ b/xen/include/xen/vpci.h
>>> @@ -91,6 +91,7 @@ struct vpci {
>>> /* FIXME: currently there's no s
Hi Roger,
On 12/04/2021 11:49, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 05:00:41PM +0100, Rahul Singh wrote:
MSI related code in the "passthrough/pci.c” file is not useful for ARM
when MSI interrupts are injected via GICv3 ITS.
Therefore introducing the new flag CONFIG_PCI_MSI_INTERCEPT
Hi Jan,
> On 12 Apr 2021, at 12:28 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 12.04.2021 12:49, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 05:00:41PM +0100, Rahul Singh wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/msi.c
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/msi.c
>>> @@ -1411,6 +1411,70 @@ void __init early_msi_init(void)
>>>
Hi Roger,
> On 12 Apr 2021, at 11:49 am, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 05:00:41PM +0100, Rahul Singh wrote:
>> MSI related code in the "passthrough/pci.c” file is not useful for ARM
>> when MSI interrupts are injected via GICv3 ITS.
>>
>> Therefore introducing the new flag
On 12.04.2021 12:49, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 05:00:41PM +0100, Rahul Singh wrote:
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/msi.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/msi.c
>> @@ -1411,6 +1411,70 @@ void __init early_msi_init(void)
>> return;
>> }
>>
>> +int alloc_pci_msi(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>
On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 05:00:41PM +0100, Rahul Singh wrote:
> MSI related code in the "passthrough/pci.c” file is not useful for ARM
> when MSI interrupts are injected via GICv3 ITS.
>
> Therefore introducing the new flag CONFIG_PCI_MSI_INTERCEPT to gate the
> MSI code for ARM in common code. Als
27 matches
Mail list logo
