On 15/09/2021 10:30, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 14.09.2021 18:43, Kevin Stefanov wrote:
>> --- a/tools/libs/light/libxl_x86_acpi.c
>> +++ b/tools/libs/light/libxl_x86_acpi.c
>> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
>>
>> /* Number of pages holding ACPI tables */
>> #define NUM_ACPI_PAGES 16
>> +#define ALIGN(p, a) (
On 14.09.2021 18:43, Kevin Stefanov wrote:
> --- a/tools/libs/light/libxl_x86_acpi.c
> +++ b/tools/libs/light/libxl_x86_acpi.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
>
> /* Number of pages holding ACPI tables */
> #define NUM_ACPI_PAGES 16
> +#define ALIGN(p, a) (((p) + ((a) - 1)) & ~((a) - 1))
Wouldn't this be
On 14/09/2021 17:43, Kevin Stefanov wrote:
> The memory allocator currently calculates alignment in libxl's virtual
> address space, rather than guest physical address space. This results
> in the FACS being commonly misaligned.
>
> Furthermore, the allocator has several other bugs.
>
> The opencod
