On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 07:26:20AM +, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
> On 2025/3/27 17:25, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 03:32:12PM +0800, Jiqian Chen wrote:
> >> When vpci fails to initialize a capability of a device, it just
> >> return error instead of catching and processing excep
On 2025/3/27 17:25, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 03:32:12PM +0800, Jiqian Chen wrote:
>> When vpci fails to initialize a capability of a device, it just
>> return error instead of catching and processing exception. That
>> makes the entire device unusable.
>>
>> So, refactor REG
On 2025/3/31 16:43, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 07:26:20AM +, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
>> On 2025/3/27 17:25, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 03:32:12PM +0800, Jiqian Chen wrote:
#endif /* CONFIG_HAS_VPCI_GUEST_SUPPORT */
+static int vpci_in
On 2025/3/31 19:04, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 09:32:02AM +, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
>> So, I need to refactor the emulating PCI capability list codes of
>> init_header() to serve
>> for all domain(dom0+domUs) firstly, since current codes only emulate PCI
>> capability list
On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 09:32:02AM +, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
> On 2025/3/31 16:43, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 07:26:20AM +, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
> >> On 2025/3/27 17:25, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 03:32:12PM +0800, Jiqian Chen wrote:
> #e
On 31.03.2025 10:43, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 07:26:20AM +, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
>> On 2025/3/27 17:25, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 03:32:12PM +0800, Jiqian Chen wrote:
--- a/xen/drivers/vpci/vpci.c
+++ b/xen/drivers/vpci/vpci.c
@@ -3
On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 03:32:12PM +0800, Jiqian Chen wrote:
> When vpci fails to initialize a capability of a device, it just
> return error instead of catching and processing exception. That
> makes the entire device unusable.
>
> So, refactor REGISTER_VPCI_INIT to contain more capability specif
