On 4/15/25 1:23 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 15.04.2025 13:11, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
On 4/10/25 5:35 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 08.04.2025 17:57, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
@@ -21,6 +22,22 @@ static struct intc_info __ro_after_init aplic_info = {
.hw_version = INTC_APLIC,
};
+static
On 15.04.2025 13:11, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
> On 4/10/25 5:35 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 08.04.2025 17:57, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
>>> @@ -21,6 +22,22 @@ static struct intc_info __ro_after_init aplic_info = {
>>> .hw_version = INTC_APLIC,
>>> };
>>>
>>> +static int aplic_irq_xlate(con
On 4/10/25 5:35 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 08.04.2025 17:57, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
@@ -21,6 +22,22 @@ static struct intc_info __ro_after_init aplic_info = {
.hw_version = INTC_APLIC,
};
+static int aplic_irq_xlate(const uint32_t *intspec, unsigned int intsize,
As you start adding f
On 08.04.2025 17:57, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
> @@ -21,6 +22,22 @@ static struct intc_info __ro_after_init aplic_info = {
> .hw_version = INTC_APLIC,
> };
>
> +static int aplic_irq_xlate(const uint32_t *intspec, unsigned int intsize,
As you start adding functions calling indirectly, please