Re: [PATCH for 4.21 v5] xen/riscv: identify specific ISA supported by cpu

On 11.02.2025 17:50, Oleksii Kurochko wrote: > On 2/11/25 4:47 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 11.02.2025 16:28, Oleksii Kurochko wrote: >>> On 2/11/25 11:01 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: On 11.02.2025 10:53, Oleksii Kurochko wrote: > On 2/10/25 5:19 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 07.02.2025 21:07

Re: [PATCH for 4.21 v5] xen/riscv: identify specific ISA supported by cpu

On 2/11/25 4:47 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: On 11.02.2025 16:28, Oleksii Kurochko wrote: On 2/11/25 11:01 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: On 11.02.2025 10:53, Oleksii Kurochko wrote: On 2/10/25 5:19 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: On 07.02.2025 21:07, Oleksii Kurochko wrote: +/* + * The canonical order of ISA ext

Re: [PATCH for 4.21 v5] xen/riscv: identify specific ISA supported by cpu

On 11.02.2025 16:28, Oleksii Kurochko wrote: > > On 2/11/25 11:01 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 11.02.2025 10:53, Oleksii Kurochko wrote: >>> On 2/10/25 5:19 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: On 07.02.2025 21:07, Oleksii Kurochko wrote: > +/* > + * The canonical order of ISA extension names in th

Re: [PATCH for 4.21 v5] xen/riscv: identify specific ISA supported by cpu

On 2/11/25 11:01 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: On 11.02.2025 10:53, Oleksii Kurochko wrote: On 2/10/25 5:19 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: On 07.02.2025 21:07, Oleksii Kurochko wrote: +/* + * The canonical order of ISA extension names in the ISA string is defined in + * chapter 27 of the unprivileged specif

Re: [PATCH for 4.21 v5] xen/riscv: identify specific ISA supported by cpu

On 11.02.2025 10:53, Oleksii Kurochko wrote: > On 2/10/25 5:19 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 07.02.2025 21:07, Oleksii Kurochko wrote: >>> +/* >>> + * The canonical order of ISA extension names in the ISA string is defined >>> in >>> + * chapter 27 of the unprivileged specification. >>> + * >>> + *

Re: [PATCH for 4.21 v5] xen/riscv: identify specific ISA supported by cpu

On 2/10/25 5:19 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: On 07.02.2025 21:07, Oleksii Kurochko wrote: +/* + * The canonical order of ISA extension names in the ISA string is defined in + * chapter 27 of the unprivileged specification. + * + * The specification uses vague wording, such as should, when it comes to

Re: [PATCH for 4.21 v5] xen/riscv: identify specific ISA supported by cpu

On 07.02.2025 21:07, Oleksii Kurochko wrote: > +/* > + * The canonical order of ISA extension names in the ISA string is defined in > + * chapter 27 of the unprivileged specification. > + * > + * The specification uses vague wording, such as should, when it comes to > + * ordering, so for our purpo