On 3/12/21 10:09 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 25.02.2021 16:24, Connor Davis wrote:
--- a/xen/include/public/hvm/save.h
+++ b/xen/include/public/hvm/save.h
@@ -106,6 +106,8 @@ DECLARE_HVM_SAVE_TYPE(END, 0, struct hvm_save_end);
#include "../arch-x86/hvm/save.h"
#elif defined(__arm__) || defin
On 25.02.2021 16:24, Connor Davis wrote:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/xen/include/public/arch-riscv.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,183 @@
> +/**
> + * arch-riscv.h
> + *
> + * Guest OS interface to RISC-V Xen.
> + * Initially based on the ARM i
On 25.02.2021 16:24, Connor Davis wrote:
> --- a/xen/drivers/char/serial.c
> +++ b/xen/drivers/char/serial.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> #include
> #include
> #include
> +#include
Btw - changes like this one would better be split off, so
they would come with a justification / description. A file
On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 05:06:46PM -0800, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Feb 2021, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> > On 25/02/2021 15:24, Connor Davis wrote:
> > > Add the minimum code required to get xen to build with
> > > XEN_TARGET_ARCH=riscv64. It is minimal in the sense that every file and
> >
On 26/02/2021 16:21, Bob Eshleman wrote:
>>> On 2/25/21 3:14 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>>
>>> It sounds like you'd prefer no common to start and none of the
>>> arch_* calls it relies on?
>> We definitely want "stuff compiled under RISC-V" to be caught in CI, but
>> that doesn't mean "wedge all of
>> On 2/25/21 3:14 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>
>> It sounds like you'd prefer no common to start and none of the
>> arch_* calls it relies on?
>
> We definitely want "stuff compiled under RISC-V" to be caught in CI, but
> that doesn't mean "wedge all of common in with stubs to begin with".
>
> Ho
On 26/02/2021 15:30, Bob Eshleman wrote:
> On 2/25/21 3:14 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> Well - this is orders of magnitude more complicated than it ought to
>> be. An empty head.S doesn't (well - shouldn't) need the overwhelming
>> majority of this.
>>
>> Do you know how all of this is being pulled
On 2/25/21 3:14 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>
> Well - this is orders of magnitude more complicated than it ought to
> be. An empty head.S doesn't (well - shouldn't) need the overwhelming
> majority of this.
>
> Do you know how all of this is being pulled in? Is it from attempting
> to compile com
On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 11:14:53PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 25/02/2021 15:24, Connor Davis wrote:
> > Add the minimum code required to get xen to build with
> > XEN_TARGET_ARCH=riscv64. It is minimal in the sense that every file and
> > function added is required for a successful build, giv
On Thu, 25 Feb 2021, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 25/02/2021 15:24, Connor Davis wrote:
> > Add the minimum code required to get xen to build with
> > XEN_TARGET_ARCH=riscv64. It is minimal in the sense that every file and
> > function added is required for a successful build, given the .config
> > ge
On 25/02/2021 15:24, Connor Davis wrote:
> Add the minimum code required to get xen to build with
> XEN_TARGET_ARCH=riscv64. It is minimal in the sense that every file and
> function added is required for a successful build, given the .config
> generated from riscv64_defconfig. The function impleme
11 matches
Mail list logo
