On 11.11.20 21:27, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Oleksandr,
Hi Julien.
On 11/11/2020 00:03, Oleksandr wrote:
On 16.10.20 11:41, Julien Grall wrote:
On 16/10/2020 07:29, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 15.10.2020 18:44, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
@@ -1067,7 +1068,14 @@ static int __p2m_set_entry(struc
Hi Oleksandr,
On 11/11/2020 00:03, Oleksandr wrote:
On 16.10.20 11:41, Julien Grall wrote:
On 16/10/2020 07:29, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 15.10.2020 18:44, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
@@ -1067,7 +1068,14 @@ static int __p2m_set_entry(struct p2m_domain
*p2m,
*/
if ( p2m_is_valid(ori
On 16.10.20 11:41, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Jan, Julien
Sorry for the late response.
Hi Jan,
On 16/10/2020 07:29, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 15.10.2020 18:44, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
@@ -1067,7 +1068,14 @@ static int __p2m_set_entry(struct p2m_domain
*p2m,
*/
if ( p2m_is_valid(
On 16.10.2020 10:41, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 16/10/2020 07:29, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Given how p2m_free_entry() works (or is supposed to work in the
>> long run), is the new code you add guaranteed to only alter leaf
>> entries?
>
> This path may also be called with tables. I think we want to mov
Hi Jan,
On 16/10/2020 07:29, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 15.10.2020 18:44, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
@@ -1067,7 +1068,14 @@ static int __p2m_set_entry(struct p2m_domain *p2m,
*/
if ( p2m_is_valid(orig_pte) &&
!mfn_eq(lpae_get_mfn(*entry), lpae_get_mfn(orig_pte)) )
+{
+#i
On 15.10.2020 18:44, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
> @@ -1067,7 +1068,14 @@ static int __p2m_set_entry(struct p2m_domain *p2m,
> */
> if ( p2m_is_valid(orig_pte) &&
> !mfn_eq(lpae_get_mfn(*entry), lpae_get_mfn(orig_pte)) )
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_IOREQ_SERVER
> +if ( do
