On 20.03.2025 12:00, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 20/03/2025 10:18 am, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 20.03.2025 10:53, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 20.03.2025 09:34, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 20.03.2025 09:14, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> I wonder how this worked then, as I've tested with the xen.efi smoke
>
On 20/03/2025 10:18 am, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 20.03.2025 10:53, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 20.03.2025 09:34, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 20.03.2025 09:14, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
I wonder how this worked then, as I've tested with the xen.efi smoke
test in gitlab CI. Maybe ovmf doesn't ackno
On 20.03.2025 09:34, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 20.03.2025 09:14, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> I wonder how this worked then, as I've tested with the xen.efi smoke
>> test in gitlab CI. Maybe ovmf doesn't acknowledge the RX sections and
>> unconditionally sets all mappings as writable?
>
> Possible. An
On 20.03.2025 10:53, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 20.03.2025 09:34, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 20.03.2025 09:14, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>> I wonder how this worked then, as I've tested with the xen.efi smoke
>>> test in gitlab CI. Maybe ovmf doesn't acknowledge the RX sections and
>>> unconditionally se
On 20.03.2025 09:14, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 11:46:22AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 19.03.2025 11:32, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 18.03.2025 18:35, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
Relocations are now applied after having moved the trampoline,
>>>
>>> That's two entirely diffe
On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 11:46:22AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 19.03.2025 11:32, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > On 18.03.2025 18:35, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> >> Relocations are now applied after having moved the trampoline,
> >
> > That's two entirely different sets of relocations, isn't it?
Right, t
On 19.03.2025 11:46, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 19.03.2025 11:32, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 18.03.2025 18:35, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
>>> Relocations are now applied after having moved the trampoline,
>>
>> That's two entirely different sets of relocations, isn't it? What we generate
>> here is what is
On 19.03.2025 11:32, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 18.03.2025 18:35, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
>> Relocations are now applied after having moved the trampoline,
>
> That's two entirely different sets of relocations, isn't it? What we generate
> here is what is to be encoded in the PE binary's .reloc sectio
On 18.03.2025 18:35, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> Relocations are now applied after having moved the trampoline,
That's two entirely different sets of relocations, isn't it? What we generate
here is what is to be encoded in the PE binary's .reloc section, for the PE
loader to process. And for us to th
On 18/03/2025 5:35 pm, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> Relocations are now applied after having moved the trampoline, so there's no
> reason to warn about relocations to read-only sections. The logic that
> apply the relocations would make sure they are applied against writable
> mappings.
>
> Signed-off
10 matches
Mail list logo
