Re: [PATCH 4/6] x86: Convert users of INTEL_FAM6_MODEL() to X86_MATCH_VFM()

2025-07-17 Thread Jan Beulich
On 17.07.2025 19:57, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 17/07/2025 8:44 am, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 16.07.2025 19:31, Andrew Cooper wrote: >>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpu_idle.c >>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpu_idle.c >>> @@ -583,7 +583,6 @@ bool errata_c6_workaround(void) >>> >>> if ( unlikely(fix_n

Re: [PATCH 4/6] x86: Convert users of INTEL_FAM6_MODEL() to X86_MATCH_VFM()

2025-07-17 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 17/07/2025 8:44 am, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 16.07.2025 19:31, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpu_idle.c >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpu_idle.c >> @@ -583,7 +583,6 @@ bool errata_c6_workaround(void) >> >> if ( unlikely(fix_needed == -1) ) >> { >> -#define INTEL_FAM6_MO

Re: [PATCH 4/6] x86: Convert users of INTEL_FAM6_MODEL() to X86_MATCH_VFM()

2025-07-17 Thread Jan Beulich
On 16.07.2025 19:31, Andrew Cooper wrote: > This replaces raw model numbers (and comments in some cases) with names. For > probe_mwait_errata(), merge the comments with the table to make it easier to > see which erratum is which, and drop a stray "Problem" in LNL030. > > No functional change. >