Hi Jan,
I apologize for the confusion. I initially believed this patch would
reduce the outstanding violations to zero on x86, but in reality, there
are still 1,415 remaining.
https://gitlab.com/xen-project/people/sstabellini/xen/-/jobs/10660702979
Given this, I believe we should consider global
On 10.07.2025 02:35, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Jul 2025, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> What fine grained deviation do you have in mind?
>>
>> Ones for almost(?) everything that is having actual code changes right now
>> in this series.
>
> We could easily deviate alternative.c based on the fi
On Wed, 9 Jul 2025, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > What fine grained deviation do you have in mind?
>
> Ones for almost(?) everything that is having actual code changes right now
> in this series.
We could easily deviate alternative.c based on the file name alone. But
for the rest:
emulate.c: casts from
On 08.07.2025 19:32, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jul 2025, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 08.07.2025 00:00, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>> On Tue, 24 Jun 2025, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 24.06.2025 02:20, victorm.l...@amd.com wrote:
> From: Nicola Vetrini
>
> Use {get,put}_unaligned
On Tue, 8 Jul 2025, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 08.07.2025 00:00, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Jun 2025, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> On 24.06.2025 02:20, victorm.l...@amd.com wrote:
> >>> From: Nicola Vetrini
> >>>
> >>> Use {get,put}_unaligned_t to ensure that reads and writes are
> >>> safe
On 08.07.2025 00:00, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2025, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 24.06.2025 02:20, victorm.l...@amd.com wrote:
>>> From: Nicola Vetrini
>>>
>>> Use {get,put}_unaligned_t to ensure that reads and writes are
>>> safe to perform even on potentially misaligned pointers.
>
On Tue, 24 Jun 2025, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 24.06.2025 02:20, victorm.l...@amd.com wrote:
> > From: Nicola Vetrini
> >
> > Use {get,put}_unaligned_t to ensure that reads and writes are
> > safe to perform even on potentially misaligned pointers.
>
> Also applicable to the Arm patch: Please can
On 24.06.2025 02:20, victorm.l...@amd.com wrote:
> From: Nicola Vetrini
>
> Use {get,put}_unaligned_t to ensure that reads and writes are
> safe to perform even on potentially misaligned pointers.
Also applicable to the Arm patch: Please can such patches mention the
main subject of the rule, not
