On Wed, 12 Feb 2025, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> On 12.02.25 02:30, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Feb 2025, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > > In case xen_swiotlb_alloc_coherent() needed to create a contiguous
> > > region only for other reason than the memory not being compliant with
> > > the device'
On 12.02.2025 12:11, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> On 12.02.25 08:38, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 11.02.2025 13:04, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> In case xen_swiotlb_alloc_coherent() needed to create a contiguous
>>> region only for other reason than the memory not being compliant with
>>> the device's DMA mask, th
On 12.02.25 02:30, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Tue, 11 Feb 2025, Juergen Gross wrote:
In case xen_swiotlb_alloc_coherent() needed to create a contiguous
region only for other reason than the memory not being compliant with
the device's DMA mask, there is no reason why this contiguous region
sho
On 12.02.25 08:38, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 11.02.2025 13:04, Juergen Gross wrote:
In case xen_swiotlb_alloc_coherent() needed to create a contiguous
region only for other reason than the memory not being compliant with
the device's DMA mask, there is no reason why this contiguous region
should be
On 11.02.2025 13:04, Juergen Gross wrote:
> In case xen_swiotlb_alloc_coherent() needed to create a contiguous
> region only for other reason than the memory not being compliant with
> the device's DMA mask, there is no reason why this contiguous region
> should be destroyed by xen_swiotlb_free_coh
On Tue, 11 Feb 2025, Juergen Gross wrote:
> In case xen_swiotlb_alloc_coherent() needed to create a contiguous
> region only for other reason than the memory not being compliant with
> the device's DMA mask, there is no reason why this contiguous region
> should be destroyed by xen_swiotlb_free_coh
