On 21.02.2024 10:34, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 20/02/2024 12:25, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 20.02.2024 12:52, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> Hi Jan,
>>>
>>> On 20/02/2024 08:26, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 19.02.2024 23:22, Julien Grall wrote:
> Title: I would add 'gnttab:' to clarify which subsy
Hi,
On 20/02/2024 12:25, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 20.02.2024 12:52, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Jan,
On 20/02/2024 08:26, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 19.02.2024 23:22, Julien Grall wrote:
Title: I would add 'gnttab:' to clarify which subsystem you are modifying.
That's how I actually have it here; it's
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 3:17 PM Jan Beulich wrote:
> > #1 by itself is probably enough to counterindicate this kind of
> > behavior. Add them together, and I'm inclined to say that we should
> > write a policy against such optimizations, without specific
> > justifications.
>
> It's not like I di
On 21.02.2024 03:32, George Dunlap wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 4:26 PM Jan Beulich wrote:
+if ( (cflush->offset | cflush->length) > PAGE_SIZE ||
>>>
>>> This is confusing. I understand you are trying to force the compiler to
>>> optimize. But is it really worth it? After all, the res
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 4:26 PM Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> +if ( (cflush->offset | cflush->length) > PAGE_SIZE ||
> >
> > This is confusing. I understand you are trying to force the compiler to
> > optimize. But is it really worth it? After all, the rest of operation
> > will outweight this check
On 20.02.2024 12:52, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> On 20/02/2024 08:26, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 19.02.2024 23:22, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> Title: I would add 'gnttab:' to clarify which subsystem you are modifying.
>>
>> That's how I actually have it here; it's not clear to me why I lost the
>>
Hi Jan,
On 20/02/2024 08:26, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 19.02.2024 23:22, Julien Grall wrote:
Title: I would add 'gnttab:' to clarify which subsystem you are modifying.
That's how I actually have it here; it's not clear to me why I lost the
prefix when sending.
On 05/02/2024 11:03, Jan Beulich w
On 19.02.2024 23:22, Julien Grall wrote:
> Title: I would add 'gnttab:' to clarify which subsystem you are modifying.
That's how I actually have it here; it's not clear to me why I lost the
prefix when sending.
> On 05/02/2024 11:03, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Along the line with observations in the c
Hi Jan,
Title: I would add 'gnttab:' to clarify which subsystem you are modifying.
On 05/02/2024 11:03, Jan Beulich wrote:
Along the line with observations in the context of XSA-448, besides
"op" no field is relevant when the range to be flushed is empty, much
like e.g. the pointers passed to m
