On Sat May 31, 2025 at 2:39 AM CEST, dmkhn wrote:
> On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 02:02:23PM +0200, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
>> ... back into bootfdt.c
>>
>> These will be required by x86 later on to detect modules in the early scan of
>> the FDT. They are independent of bootinfo, so it's cleaner for th
On 31.05.2025 03:47, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Fri, 30 May 2025, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/xen/common/device-tree/bootfdt.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
>> +#include
>> +#include
>> +#include
>> +#include
>> +
>> +uint32_t __i
On Fri, 30 May 2025, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
> ... back into bootfdt.c
>
> These will be required by x86 later on to detect modules in the early scan of
> the FDT. They are independent of bootinfo, so it's cleaner for them to exist
> in
> a separate file.
>
> Not a functional change.
>
> Signe
On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 02:02:23PM +0200, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
> ... back into bootfdt.c
>
> These will be required by x86 later on to detect modules in the early scan of
> the FDT. They are independent of bootinfo, so it's cleaner for them to exist
> in
> a separate file.
>
> Not a function
