On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 02:08:00PM +0100, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 12:17 PM Andrew Cooper
> wrote:
> >
> > The format of the buildid is a property of the binary, not a property of how
> > it was loaded. This fixes buildid recognition when starting xen.efi from
> > it's
>
On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:16:36 -0400 Andrew Cooper
wrote ---
> The format of the buildid is a property of the binary, not a property of how
> it was loaded. This fixes buildid recognition when starting xen.efi from
> it's
> MB2 entrypoint.
>
> Suggested-by: Ross Lagerwall
> Si
On Thu, Jun 05, 2025 at 12:16:36PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> The format of the buildid is a property of the binary, not a property of how
> it was loaded. This fixes buildid recognition when starting xen.efi from it's
> MB2 entrypoint.
>
> Suggested-by: Ross Lagerwall
> Signed-off-by: Andrew
On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 12:17 PM Andrew Cooper wrote:
>
> The format of the buildid is a property of the binary, not a property of how
> it was loaded. This fixes buildid recognition when starting xen.efi from it's
> MB2 entrypoint.
>
> Suggested-by: Ross Lagerwall
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
On 23.06.2025 22:18, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 16/06/2025 7:27 am, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> To expand on my earlier suggestion (ab)using the "efi" global: With
>> the linker script having this
>>
>> #ifdef EFI
>> .reloc ALIGN(4) : {
>> __base_relocs_start = .;
>> *(.reloc)
>> __base_relo
On 16/06/2025 7:27 am, Jan Beulich wrote:
> To expand on my earlier suggestion (ab)using the "efi" global: With
> the linker script having this
>
> #ifdef EFI
> .reloc ALIGN(4) : {
> __base_relocs_start = .;
> *(.reloc)
> __base_relocs_end = .;
> }
> #elif defined(XEN_BUILD_EFI)
>
On 13.06.2025 23:28, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 10/06/2025 9:01 am, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 06.06.2025 17:01, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> On 06/06/2025 8:22 am, Jan Beulich wrote:
And then, based on your reasoning above, why don't you also drop the
#ifdef CONFIG_X86?
>>> Because that's the o
On Fri, 6 Jun 2025, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > But the argument I'm going to make this this: Why do you want a check,
> > even if you can find a correct one (and as said before, I cannot)?
> >
> > This function is run exactly once. We've excluded "nothing given by the
> > toolchain", and excluded "w
On 10/06/2025 9:01 am, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 06.06.2025 17:01, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 06/06/2025 8:22 am, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 05.06.2025 19:01, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 05/06/2025 2:24 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 05.06.2025 14:14, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 05/06/2025 1:02 p
On 06.06.2025 17:01, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 06/06/2025 8:22 am, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 05.06.2025 19:01, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> On 05/06/2025 2:24 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 05.06.2025 14:14, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 05/06/2025 1:02 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 05.06.2025 13:16,
On 06/06/2025 8:22 am, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 05.06.2025 19:01, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 05/06/2025 2:24 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 05.06.2025 14:14, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 05/06/2025 1:02 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 05.06.2025 13:16, Andrew Cooper wrote:
This really is a prope
On 06.06.2025 09:22, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 05.06.2025 19:01, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 05/06/2025 2:24 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 05.06.2025 14:14, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 05/06/2025 1:02 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 05.06.2025 13:16, Andrew Cooper wrote:
This really is a propert
On 05.06.2025 19:01, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 05/06/2025 2:24 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 05.06.2025 14:14, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> On 05/06/2025 1:02 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 05.06.2025 13:16, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> This really is a property of being a PE32+ binary, and nothing to do
>>
On 05/06/2025 2:24 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 05.06.2025 14:14, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 05/06/2025 1:02 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 05.06.2025 13:16, Andrew Cooper wrote:
The format of the buildid is a property of the binary, not a property of
how
it was loaded. This fixes bu
On Thu, Jun 05, 2025 at 03:08:07PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 05.06.2025 14:20, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 05, 2025 at 02:02:21PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> On 05.06.2025 13:16, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> >>> The format of the buildid is a property of the binary, not a pr
On 05.06.2025 14:14, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 05/06/2025 1:02 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 05.06.2025 13:16, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> The format of the buildid is a property of the binary, not a property of how
>>> it was loaded. This fixes buildid recognition when starting xen.efi from
>>> it's
On 05.06.2025 14:20, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 05, 2025 at 02:02:21PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 05.06.2025 13:16, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> The format of the buildid is a property of the binary, not a property of how
>>> it was loaded. This fixes buildid recognition when
On Thu, Jun 05, 2025 at 02:02:21PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 05.06.2025 13:16, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> > The format of the buildid is a property of the binary, not a property of how
> > it was loaded. This fixes buildid recognition when starting xen.efi from
> > it's
> > MB2 entrypoint.
> >
On 05/06/2025 1:02 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 05.06.2025 13:16, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> The format of the buildid is a property of the binary, not a property of how
>> it was loaded. This fixes buildid recognition when starting xen.efi from
>> it's
>> MB2 entrypoint.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Ross Lag
On 05.06.2025 13:16, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> The format of the buildid is a property of the binary, not a property of how
> it was loaded. This fixes buildid recognition when starting xen.efi from it's
> MB2 entrypoint.
>
> Suggested-by: Ross Lagerwall
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
I'll pick t
20 matches
Mail list logo
