On 31.03.2025 17:22, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 31/03/2025 1:06 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 31.03.2025 14:01, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> Passing the -dumpversion option to gcc may only print the major version
>>> (for 4.x.y it printed major and minor, which in nowaday's scheme is then
>>> indeed just 5
On 31/03/2025 1:06 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 31.03.2025 14:01, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Passing the -dumpversion option to gcc may only print the major version
>> (for 4.x.y it printed major and minor, which in nowaday's scheme is then
>> indeed just 5 for 5.x).
> I meanwhile notice that my self-bui
On 31.03.2025 14:01, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Passing the -dumpversion option to gcc may only print the major version
> (for 4.x.y it printed major and minor, which in nowaday's scheme is then
> indeed just 5 for 5.x).
I meanwhile notice that my self-built compilers print 3 digits, so there
really is
