Hi Stefano,
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefano Stabellini
> > I would not block this series on the renaming for existing property (what
> > matter is the new ones are consistent with the discussion). The renaming
> could
> > be done afterwards. I would even say post the feature freeze o
On Wed, 7 Sep 2022, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Sep 2022, Julien Grall wrote:
> > On 07/09/2022 14:49, Henry Wang wrote:
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Bertrand Marquis
> > > > > > > > But in any case we should only add one pair here for sure, as
> > > > > > > > you
>
On Wed, 7 Sep 2022, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 07/09/2022 14:49, Henry Wang wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Bertrand Marquis
> > > > > > > But in any case we should only add one pair here for sure, as you
> > > > > > > say
> > > the
> > > > > > > only implication is to add a coup
Hi Julien,
> -Original Message-
> From: Julien Grall
> > I think I've addressed all comments from Julien regarding my series,
>
> If it is not too late for you would you be able to resend your series
> without the 'address-cells'/'size-cells' change? This will give me the
> opportunity t
On 07/09/2022 15:04, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Henry,
On 07/09/2022 14:49, Henry Wang wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Bertrand Marquis
But in any case we should only add one pair here for sure, as you
say
the
only implication is to add a couple of 0 in the worst case.
I agree. The o
Hi Henry,
On 07/09/2022 14:49, Henry Wang wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Bertrand Marquis
But in any case we should only add one pair here for sure, as you say
the
only implication is to add a couple of 0 in the worst case.
I agree. The only drawback is the need to modify the alrea
Hi Henry,
> On 7 Sep 2022, at 14:49, Henry Wang wrote:
>
> Hi Bertrand and Michal,
>
> I don't want to spam the email so I just reply here...
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Bertrand Marquis
>> But in any case we should only add one pair here for sure, as you say
>> the
>> on
Hi Bertrand and Michal,
I don't want to spam the email so I just reply here...
> -Original Message-
> From: Bertrand Marquis
> But in any case we should only add one pair here for sure, as you say
> the
> only implication is to add a couple of 0 in the worst case.
> >>> I agree
Hi,
> On 7 Sep 2022, at 14:37, Michal Orzel wrote:
>
>
>
> On 07/09/2022 15:33, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
>>
>>> On 7 Sep 2022, at 14:31, Michal Orzel wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 07/09/2022 15:28, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
Hi Michal,
> On 7 Sep 2022, at 14:09, Michal Orzel
Hi Henry,
> On 7 Sep 2022, at 14:35, Henry Wang wrote:
>
> Hi Michal,
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Michal Orzel
>>> I am not convinced by the arguments on not using #address-cells and will
>>> leave that one to Stefano
>>>
>>> But in any case we should only add one pair here for s
On 07/09/2022 15:33, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
>
>> On 7 Sep 2022, at 14:31, Michal Orzel wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 07/09/2022 15:28, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Michal,
>>>
On 7 Sep 2022, at 14:09, Michal Orzel wrote:
On 07/09/2022 14:45, Julien Grall wrote:
>
>
Hi Michal,
> -Original Message-
> From: Michal Orzel
> > I am not convinced by the arguments on not using #address-cells and will
> > leave that one to Stefano
> >
> > But in any case we should only add one pair here for sure, as you say the
> > only implication is to add a couple of 0 in
> On 7 Sep 2022, at 14:31, Michal Orzel wrote:
>
>
>
> On 07/09/2022 15:28, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
>>
>> Hi Michal,
>>
>>> On 7 Sep 2022, at 14:09, Michal Orzel wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 07/09/2022 14:45, Julien Grall wrote:
On 07/09/2022 13:41, Michal Orzel wrote:
>
>
On 07/09/2022 15:28, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
>
> Hi Michal,
>
>> On 7 Sep 2022, at 14:09, Michal Orzel wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 07/09/2022 14:45, Julien Grall wrote:
>>>
>>> On 07/09/2022 13:41, Michal Orzel wrote:
On 07/09/2022 14:32, Julien Grall wrote:
> [CAUTION: External Ema
Hi Michal,
> On 7 Sep 2022, at 14:09, Michal Orzel wrote:
>
>
> On 07/09/2022 14:45, Julien Grall wrote:
>>
>> On 07/09/2022 13:41, Michal Orzel wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 07/09/2022 14:32, Julien Grall wrote:
[CAUTION: External Email]
On 07/09/2022 13:12, Michal Orzel wrote:
Hi,
> On 7 Sep 2022, at 13:45, Julien Grall wrote:
>
>
>
> On 07/09/2022 13:41, Michal Orzel wrote:
>> On 07/09/2022 14:32, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> [CAUTION: External Email]
>>>
>>> On 07/09/2022 13:12, Michal Orzel wrote:
Hi Julien,
>>>
>>> Hi Michal,
>>>
On 07/09/2022 13:36, Jul
On 07/09/2022 14:45, Julien Grall wrote:
>
> On 07/09/2022 13:41, Michal Orzel wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 07/09/2022 14:32, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> [CAUTION: External Email]
>>>
>>> On 07/09/2022 13:12, Michal Orzel wrote:
Hi Julien,
>>>
>>> Hi Michal,
>>>
On 07/09/2022 13:36, Julien Grall wro
On 07/09/2022 13:41, Michal Orzel wrote:
On 07/09/2022 14:32, Julien Grall wrote:
[CAUTION: External Email]
On 07/09/2022 13:12, Michal Orzel wrote:
Hi Julien,
Hi Michal,
On 07/09/2022 13:36, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Henry,
While reviewing the binding sent by Penny I noticed some inc
On 07/09/2022 14:32, Julien Grall wrote:
> [CAUTION: External Email]
>
> On 07/09/2022 13:12, Michal Orzel wrote:
>> Hi Julien,
>
> Hi Michal,
>
>> On 07/09/2022 13:36, Julien Grall wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Henry,
>>>
>>> While reviewing the binding sent by Penny I noticed some inconsistency
>>> wit
On 07/09/2022 13:12, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
Hi,
Hi Bertrand,
On 7 Sep 2022, at 12:48, Henry Wang wrote:
Hi Julien,
-Original Message-
From: Julien Grall
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] docs, xen/arm: Introduce static heap memory
Hi Henry,
While reviewing the binding sent by
On 07/09/2022 13:12, Michal Orzel wrote:
Hi Julien,
Hi Michal,
On 07/09/2022 13:36, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Henry,
While reviewing the binding sent by Penny I noticed some inconsistency
with the one you introduced. See below.
On 07/09/2022 09:36, Henry Wang wrote:
+- xen,static-heap
+
Hi Julien,
On 07/09/2022 13:36, Julien Grall wrote:
>
> Hi Henry,
>
> While reviewing the binding sent by Penny I noticed some inconsistency
> with the one you introduced. See below.
>
> On 07/09/2022 09:36, Henry Wang wrote:
>> +- xen,static-heap
>> +
>> +Property under the top-level "chos
Hi,
> On 7 Sep 2022, at 12:48, Henry Wang wrote:
>
> Hi Julien,
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Julien Grall
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] docs, xen/arm: Introduce static heap memory
>>
>> Hi Henry,
>>
>> While reviewing
Hi Julien,
> -Original Message-
> From: Julien Grall
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] docs, xen/arm: Introduce static heap memory
>
> Hi Henry,
>
> While reviewing the binding sent by Penny I noticed some inconsistency
> with the one you introduced. See below.
Hi Henry,
While reviewing the binding sent by Penny I noticed some inconsistency
with the one you introduced. See below.
On 07/09/2022 09:36, Henry Wang wrote:
+- xen,static-heap
+
+Property under the top-level "chosen" node. It specifies the address
+and size of Xen static heap memor
Hi Julien,
> -Original Message-
> From: Julien Grall
> > -/* find first memory range not bound to a Xen domain */
> > -for ( i = 0; i < mem->nr_banks && mem->bank[i].xen_domain; i++ )
> > +/* find first memory range not bound to a Xen domain nor heap */
>
> This comment could
Hi Henry,
On 07/09/2022 09:36, Henry Wang wrote:
static int __init early_scan_node(const void *fdt,
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
index b76a84e8f5..0741645014 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
@@ -1038,9 +1038,11
27 matches
Mail list logo
