On Thu, 25 Feb 2021, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 23/02/2021 13:24, Ash Wilding wrote:
> > Hi Julien,
>
> Hi Ash,
>
> > Thanks for looking at this,
> >
> > > vcpu_block() is now gaining an smp_mb__after_atomic() to prevent the
> > > CPU to read any information about local events before the flag
> >
On 23/02/2021 13:24, Ash Wilding wrote:
Hi Julien,
Hi Ash,
Thanks for looking at this,
vcpu_block() is now gaining an smp_mb__after_atomic() to prevent the
CPU to read any information about local events before the flag
_VPF_blocked is set.
Reviewed-by: Ash Wilding
Thanks!
As an asi
Hi Julien,
Thanks for looking at this,
> vcpu_block() is now gaining an smp_mb__after_atomic() to prevent the
> CPU to read any information about local events before the flag
> _VPF_blocked is set.
Reviewed-by: Ash Wilding
As an aside,
> I couldn't convince myself whether the Arm implementat
Hi,
On 23/02/2021 07:00, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 22.02.2021 21:12, Julien Grall wrote:
On 22/02/2021 20:09, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Mon, 22 Feb 2021, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 20.02.2021 20:47, Julien Grall wrote:
This is a follow-up of the discussion that started in 2019 (see [1])
regarding
On Mon, 2021-02-22 at 12:09 -0800, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Feb 2021, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > On 20.02.2021 20:47, Julien Grall wrote:
> > >
> > > vcpu_block() is now gaining an smp_mb__after_atomic() to prevent
> > > the CPU
> > > to read any information about local events before the
On 22.02.2021 21:12, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 22/02/2021 20:09, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>> On Mon, 22 Feb 2021, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 20.02.2021 20:47, Julien Grall wrote:
This is a follow-up of the discussion that started in 2019 (see [1])
regarding a possible race between do_poll(
On Mon, 22 Feb 2021, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 22/02/2021 20:09, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Mon, 22 Feb 2021, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > On 20.02.2021 20:47, Julien Grall wrote:
> > > > From: Julien Grall
> > > >
> > > > The comment in vcpu_block() states that the events should be checked
> >
On 22/02/2021 20:09, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Mon, 22 Feb 2021, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 20.02.2021 20:47, Julien Grall wrote:
From: Julien Grall
The comment in vcpu_block() states that the events should be checked
/after/ blocking to avoids wakeup waiting race. However, from a generic
pe
On Mon, 22 Feb 2021, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 20.02.2021 20:47, Julien Grall wrote:
> > From: Julien Grall
> >
> > The comment in vcpu_block() states that the events should be checked
> > /after/ blocking to avoids wakeup waiting race. However, from a generic
> > perspective, set_bit() doesn't pre
On 20.02.2021 20:47, Julien Grall wrote:
> From: Julien Grall
>
> The comment in vcpu_block() states that the events should be checked
> /after/ blocking to avoids wakeup waiting race. However, from a generic
> perspective, set_bit() doesn't prevent re-ordering. So the following
> could happen:
>
Julien Grall writes ("[PATCH for-4.15] xen/sched: Add missing memory barrier in
vcpu_block()"):
> From: Julien Grall
>
> The comment in vcpu_block() states that the events should be checked
> /after/ blocking to avoids wakeup waiting race. However, from a generic
> perspective, set_bit() doesn't
11 matches
Mail list logo