On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 06:34:48PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Wei,
>
> On 26/06/2020 12:08, Wei Liu wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 03:57:37PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > kexec-tools has an option to load dynamically libxenctlr.so (not .so.4.x)
> > > (see [1]).
>
Hi Wei,
On 26/06/2020 12:08, Wei Liu wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 03:57:37PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi all,
kexec-tools has an option to load dynamically libxenctlr.so (not .so.4.x)
(see [1]).
Given that the library has never been considered stable, it is probably a
disaster that is wai
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 03:57:37PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> kexec-tools has an option to load dynamically libxenctlr.so (not .so.4.x)
> (see [1]).
>
> Given that the library has never been considered stable, it is probably a
> disaster that is waiting to happen.
>
> Looking at th
On 12/06/2020 10:18, Jürgen Groß wrote:
I just wanted to point out that in case you need a new stable interface
between kexec and the hypervisor you could consider using hypfs for that
purpose instead of introducing a new hypercall.
I am not looking to introduce a new interface with the hype
On 12.06.20 10:25, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Juergen,
On 12/06/2020 05:25, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 11.06.20 18:00, Julien Grall wrote:
On 11/06/2020 16:35, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 11.06.20 17:27, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,
On 11/06/2020 16:21, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 11.06.20 16:57, Julien Grall wro
Hi Juergen,
On 12/06/2020 05:25, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 11.06.20 18:00, Julien Grall wrote:
On 11/06/2020 16:35, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 11.06.20 17:27, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,
On 11/06/2020 16:21, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 11.06.20 16:57, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi all,
kexec-tools has an option
On 11.06.20 18:00, Julien Grall wrote:
On 11/06/2020 16:35, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 11.06.20 17:27, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,
On 11/06/2020 16:21, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 11.06.20 16:57, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi all,
kexec-tools has an option to load dynamically libxenctlr.so (not
.so.4.x) (see
On 11/06/2020 16:35, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 11.06.20 17:27, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,
On 11/06/2020 16:21, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 11.06.20 16:57, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi all,
kexec-tools has an option to load dynamically libxenctlr.so (not
.so.4.x) (see [1]).
Given that the library has neve
On 11.06.20 17:27, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,
On 11/06/2020 16:21, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 11.06.20 16:57, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi all,
kexec-tools has an option to load dynamically libxenctlr.so (not
.so.4.x) (see [1]).
Given that the library has never been considered stable, it is
probably a
Hi,
On 11/06/2020 16:21, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 11.06.20 16:57, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi all,
kexec-tools has an option to load dynamically libxenctlr.so (not
.so.4.x) (see [1]).
Given that the library has never been considered stable, it is
probably a disaster that is waiting to happen.
Lo
On 11.06.20 16:57, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi all,
kexec-tools has an option to load dynamically libxenctlr.so (not
.so.4.x) (see [1]).
Given that the library has never been considered stable, it is probably
a disaster that is waiting to happen.
Looking at the tree kexec is using the follow li
11 matches
Mail list logo
