On Thu, 5 Oct 2023, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 03:52:54PM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Wed, 4 Oct 2023, Julien Grall wrote:
> > > > > If we want to handle such firmware, I think it would be better if we
> > > > > provide
> > > > > an hypercall that would return the
On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 09:54:26AM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 04/10/2023 22:13, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> >>> I understand the situation is different on Arm vs x86, so if
> >>> edk2 is not supported on arm I guess it doesn't matter much whether
> >>> it's broken. It would be a much worse issu
On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 03:52:54PM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Oct 2023, Julien Grall wrote:
> > > > If we want to handle such firmware, I think it would be better if we
> > > > provide
> > > > an hypercall that would return the GFN where it is currently mapped.
> > >
> > > Sure,
On 04/10/2023 22:13, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
I understand the situation is different on Arm vs x86, so if
edk2 is not supported on arm I guess it doesn't matter much whether
it's broken. It would be a much worse issue on x86 where edk2 is
supported.
AFAIK, we have CI for x86 on EDK2 but we don
On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 03:52:54PM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Oct 2023, Julien Grall wrote:
> > > > If we want to handle such firmware, I think it would be better if we
> > > > provide
> > > > an hypercall that would return the GFN where it is currently mapped.
> > >
> > > Sure,
On Wed, 4 Oct 2023, Julien Grall wrote:
> > > This is not very different here. For Arm we decided to not follow a
> > > behavior
> > > that I consider incorrect and potentially more harmful than trying to
> > > support bootloader not removing the shared page.
> >
> > I think this is not very frien
On Wed, 4 Oct 2023, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 03:21:04PM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Wed, 4 Oct 2023, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 03:39:16PM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 02:03:43PM +0100, Julien Grall wro
On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 03:21:04PM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Oct 2023, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 03:39:16PM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 02:03:43PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 04/10/2023 13:53, Roger Pau
On Wed, 4 Oct 2023, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 03:39:16PM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 02:03:43PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> > >
> > > On 04/10/2023 13:53, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > > >
> > > > When using UEFI there's RAM that will always be
Heavily trimming earlier messages. Also doing one response to cover
several items. Hopefully I'm not missing something which needs a
response.
On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 03:39:16PM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 02:03:43PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> >
> > On 04/10/2023
Hi,
On 04/10/2023 15:53, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 03:06:14PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
Neither of the two behaviors help the users. In fact, I think they only make
the experience worse because you don't know when the issue will happen.
AFAICT, there is no way for an HVM
On 04.10.23 15:59, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
Hello Roger
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 11:42:32AM +, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 04.10.23 13:55, Julien Grall wrote:
>>
>> Hello all.
>>
>>> Hi Roger,
>>>
>>> On 04/10/2023 09:13, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 12:1
On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 03:06:14PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Roger,
>
> On 04/10/2023 14:39, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 02:03:43PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> > > Hi Roger,
> > >
> > > On 04/10/2023 13:53, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 11:55
Hi Roger,
On 04/10/2023 14:39, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 02:03:43PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Roger,
On 04/10/2023 13:53, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 11:55:05AM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Roger,
On 04/10/2023 09:13, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On T
On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 02:03:43PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Roger,
>
> On 04/10/2023 13:53, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 11:55:05AM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> > > Hi Roger,
> > >
> > > On 04/10/2023 09:13, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 12:18
Hi Roger,
On 04/10/2023 13:53, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 11:55:05AM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Roger,
On 04/10/2023 09:13, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 12:18:35PM -0700, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 10:26:28AM +0200, Roger Pau Monn
On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 11:42:32AM +, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
>
>
> On 04.10.23 13:55, Julien Grall wrote:
>
> Hello all.
>
> > Hi Roger,
> >
> > On 04/10/2023 09:13, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >> On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 12:18:35PM -0700, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Oct 03, 202
On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 11:55:05AM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Roger,
>
> On 04/10/2023 09:13, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 12:18:35PM -0700, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 10:26:28AM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 07:
On 04.10.23 13:55, Julien Grall wrote:
Hello all.
> Hi Roger,
>
> On 04/10/2023 09:13, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 12:18:35PM -0700, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 10:26:28AM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 07:49:18PM -0700,
Hi Roger,
On 04/10/2023 09:13, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 12:18:35PM -0700, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 10:26:28AM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 07:49:18PM -0700, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
I'm trying to get FreeBSD/ARM operational
On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 12:18:35PM -0700, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 10:26:28AM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 07:49:18PM -0700, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> > > I'm trying to get FreeBSD/ARM operational on Xen/ARM. Current issue is
> > > the changes
On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 10:26:28AM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 07:49:18PM -0700, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> > I'm trying to get FreeBSD/ARM operational on Xen/ARM. Current issue is
> > the changes with the handling of the shared information page appear to
> > have broken
On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 07:49:18PM -0700, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> I'm trying to get FreeBSD/ARM operational on Xen/ARM. Current issue is
> the changes with the handling of the shared information page appear to
> have broken things for me.
>
> With a pre-4.17 build of Xen/ARM things worked fine.
I'm trying to get FreeBSD/ARM operational on Xen/ARM. Current issue is
the changes with the handling of the shared information page appear to
have broken things for me.
With a pre-4.17 build of Xen/ARM things worked fine. Yet with a build
of the 4.17 release, mapping the shared information page
24 matches
Mail list logo