On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 11:07:06AM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> Interestingly, Gitlab's x86_32 build test missed this.
>
> https://gitlab.com/xen-project/people/andyhhp/xen/-/jobs/7762103169 passed.
>
> I wonder if there's anything we should have done to get better coverage.
osstest does `make
On 06.09.2024 12:07, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 06/09/2024 11:01 am, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 06/09/2024 7:08 am, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 06.09.2024 06:41, osstest service owner wrote:
flight 187507 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/187507/
On 06/09/2024 11:01 am, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 06/09/2024 7:08 am, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 06.09.2024 06:41, osstest service owner wrote:
>>> flight 187507 xen-unstable real [real]
>>> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/187507/
>>>
>>> Regressions :-(
>>>
>>> Tests which did not s
On 06/09/2024 7:08 am, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 06.09.2024 06:41, osstest service owner wrote:
>> flight 187507 xen-unstable real [real]
>> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/187507/
>>
>> Regressions :-(
>>
>> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
>> including tests which coul
On 06.09.2024 06:41, osstest service owner wrote:
> flight 187507 xen-unstable real [real]
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/187507/
>
> Regressions :-(
>
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
> build-i386-xsm6
flight 187507 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/187507/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386-xsm6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 187498
build-i386
