Re: [xen-unstable test] 164237: regressions - FAIL

2021-08-19 Thread Ian Jackson
Juergen Gross writes ("Re: [xen-unstable test] 164237: regressions - FAIL"): > Does this mean we should de-support pvgrub? Or even remove it? > > BTW, I don't see any reason why someone would want to keep using pvgrub > with grub-pv being available... I went to chan

Re: [xen-unstable test] 164237: regressions - FAIL

2021-08-19 Thread Ian Jackson
Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [xen-unstable test] 164237: regressions - FAIL"): > I will (1) drop this test and (2) force push staging in the meantime. Force pushed xen-unstable staging. osstest commit is below. Ian. >From 8dee6e333622d830b7a9373989f63b526a85cd94 Mon Sep 17 00:00:0

Re: [xen-unstable test] 164237: regressions - FAIL

2021-08-19 Thread Ian Jackson
Juergen Gross writes ("Re: [xen-unstable test] 164237: regressions - FAIL"): > Does this mean we should de-support pvgrub? Or even remove it? I think so. > BTW, I don't see any reason why someone would want to keep using pvgrub > with grub-pv being available... Precisely. Ian.

Re: [xen-unstable test] 164237: regressions - FAIL

2021-08-19 Thread Juergen Gross
On 19.08.21 14:45, Ian Jackson wrote: Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [xen-unstable test] 164237: regressions - FAIL"): Looks like this didn't sort itself (yet). Do you continue to be convinced that it will, eventually? Hooray for explanations in commit messages. I will (1) drop t

Re: [xen-unstable test] 164237: regressions - FAIL

2021-08-19 Thread Ian Jackson
Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [xen-unstable test] 164237: regressions - FAIL"): > Looks like this didn't sort itself (yet). Do you continue to be > convinced that it will, eventually? Hooray for explanations in commit messages. I will (1) drop this test and (2) force push st

Re: [xen-unstable test] 164237: regressions - FAIL

2021-08-19 Thread Ian Jackson
Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [xen-unstable test] 164237: regressions - FAIL"): > Looks like this didn't sort itself (yet). Do you continue to be > convinced that it will, eventually? Indeed not. The error message is different now. The guest installer reports 2021-08-18 18:

Re: [xen-unstable test] 164237: regressions - FAIL

2021-08-19 Thread Jan Beulich
On 19.08.2021 05:07, osstest service owner wrote: > flight 164237 xen-unstable real [real] > flight 164246 xen-unstable real-retest [real] > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/164237/ > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/164246/ > > Regressions :-( > > Tests which did

[xen-unstable test] 164237: regressions - FAIL

2021-08-18 Thread osstest service owner
flight 164237 xen-unstable real [real] flight 164246 xen-unstable real-retest [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/164237/ http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/164246/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be r