Re: [xen-4.12-testing test] 169199: regressions - FAIL

2022-04-11 Thread Julien Grall
Hi, On 08/04/2022 16:26, Roger Pau Monné wrote: On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 12:24:27PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote: Hi Roger, On 08/04/2022 12:16, Roger Pau Monné wrote: On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 12:08:02PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote: Hi, On 08/04/2022 12:01, Roger Pau Monné wrote: I could add a su

Re: [xen-4.12-testing test] 169199: regressions - FAIL

2022-04-08 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Fri, 8 Apr 2022, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 08/04/2022 16:26, Roger Pau Monne wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 12:24:27PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote: > >> Hi Roger, > >> > >> On 08/04/2022 12:16, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > >>> On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 12:08:02PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi

Re: [xen-4.12-testing test] 169199: regressions - FAIL

2022-04-08 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 08/04/2022 16:26, Roger Pau Monne wrote: > On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 12:24:27PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote: >> Hi Roger, >> >> On 08/04/2022 12:16, Roger Pau Monné wrote: >>> On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 12:08:02PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote: Hi, On 08/04/2022 12:01, Roger Pau Monné wrote:

Re: [xen-4.12-testing test] 169199: regressions - FAIL

2022-04-08 Thread Roger Pau Monné
On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 12:24:27PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi Roger, > > On 08/04/2022 12:16, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 12:08:02PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On 08/04/2022 12:01, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > > > > > > I could add a suitable dom0_max

Re: [xen-4.12-testing test] 169199: regressions - FAIL

2022-04-08 Thread Jan Beulich
On 08.04.2022 13:16, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 12:08:02PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote: >> On 08/04/2022 12:01, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > I could add a suitable dom0_max_vcpus parameter to osstest. XenServer > uses 16 for example. I'm afraid a fixed number won'

Re: [xen-4.12-testing test] 169199: regressions - FAIL

2022-04-08 Thread Jan Beulich
On 08.04.2022 13:26, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 08/04/2022 12:08, Julien Grall wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 08/04/2022 12:01, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > I could add a suitable dom0_max_vcpus parameter to osstest.  XenServer > uses 16 for example. I'm afraid a fixed number won't do, the mor

Re: [xen-4.12-testing test] 169199: regressions - FAIL

2022-04-08 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 08/04/2022 12:08, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi, > > On 08/04/2022 12:01, Roger Pau Monné wrote: I could add a suitable dom0_max_vcpus parameter to osstest.  XenServer uses 16 for example. >>> >>> I'm afraid a fixed number won't do, the more that iirc there are >>> systems with just a few c

Re: [xen-4.12-testing test] 169199: regressions - FAIL

2022-04-08 Thread Julien Grall
Hi Roger, On 08/04/2022 12:16, Roger Pau Monné wrote: On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 12:08:02PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote: Hi, On 08/04/2022 12:01, Roger Pau Monné wrote: I could add a suitable dom0_max_vcpus parameter to osstest. XenServer uses 16 for example. I'm afraid a fixed number won't do,

Re: [xen-4.12-testing test] 169199: regressions - FAIL

2022-04-08 Thread Roger Pau Monné
On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 12:08:02PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi, > > On 08/04/2022 12:01, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > > > > I could add a suitable dom0_max_vcpus parameter to osstest. XenServer > > > > uses 16 for example. > > > > > > I'm afraid a fixed number won't do, the more that iirc there

Re: [xen-4.12-testing test] 169199: regressions - FAIL

2022-04-08 Thread Julien Grall
Hi, On 08/04/2022 12:01, Roger Pau Monné wrote: I could add a suitable dom0_max_vcpus parameter to osstest. XenServer uses 16 for example. I'm afraid a fixed number won't do, the more that iirc there are systems with just a few cores in the pool (and you don't want to over-commit by default).

Re: [xen-4.12-testing test] 169199: regressions - FAIL

2022-04-08 Thread Roger Pau Monné
On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 11:25:28AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 08.04.2022 10:09, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 09:01:11AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> On 07.04.2022 10:45, osstest service owner wrote: > >>> flight 169199 xen-4.12-testing real [real] > >>> http://logs.test-

Re: [xen-4.12-testing test] 169199: regressions - FAIL

2022-04-08 Thread Jan Beulich
On 08.04.2022 10:09, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 09:01:11AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 07.04.2022 10:45, osstest service owner wrote: >>> flight 169199 xen-4.12-testing real [real] >>> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169199/ >>> >>> Regressions :-( >>> >>>

Re: [xen-4.12-testing test] 169199: regressions - FAIL

2022-04-08 Thread Roger Pau Monné
On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 09:01:11AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 07.04.2022 10:45, osstest service owner wrote: > > flight 169199 xen-4.12-testing real [real] > > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169199/ > > > > Regressions :-( > > > > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking

Re: [xen-4.12-testing test] 169199: regressions - FAIL

2022-04-08 Thread Jan Beulich
On 07.04.2022 10:45, osstest service owner wrote: > flight 169199 xen-4.12-testing real [real] > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169199/ > > Regressions :-( > > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, > including tests which could not be run: > test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-de

[xen-4.12-testing test] 169199: regressions - FAIL

2022-04-07 Thread osstest service owner
flight 169199 xen-4.12-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169199/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-debianhvm-i386-xsm 12 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 168480 Tes