> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Beulich
> Sent: 29 July 2019 12:11
> To: Paul Durrant
> Cc: xen-devel (xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org)
>
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] per-domain passthrough/iommu options
>
> On 26.07.2019 16:54, Paul Durrant wrote:
On 26.07.2019 16:54, Paul Durrant wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jan Beulich
>> Sent: 26 July 2019 15:34
>> To: Paul Durrant
>> Cc: xen-devel (xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org)
>>
>> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] per-domain passthrough/iom
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Beulich
> Sent: 26 July 2019 15:34
> To: Paul Durrant
> Cc: xen-devel (xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org)
>
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] per-domain passthrough/iommu options
>
> On 26.07.2019 16:26, Paul Durrant wrote:
> >&
On 26.07.2019 16:26, Paul Durrant wrote:
>> From: Jan Beulich
>> Sent: 26 July 2019 15:02
>>
>> On 26.07.2019 15:39, Paul Durrant wrote:
>>> ? I don't think 'private-pt' or 'separate-pt' really capture the fact that
>>> the page tables match the
>> P2M. They could just as easily be taken to mean
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Beulich
> Sent: 26 July 2019 15:02
> To: Paul Durrant
> Cc: xen-devel (xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org)
>
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] per-domain passthrough/iommu options
>
> On 26.07.2019 15:39, Paul Durrant wrote:
> >
On 26.07.2019 15:39, Paul Durrant wrote:
> Not sure how 'on' would co-exist with 'viommu'... the crucial difference is
> whether the p2m is shared or not and the currently the only option in the
> non-shared case, because we lack a viommu, is to keep the IOMMU mappings in
> sync with the P2M whe
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Beulich
> Sent: 26 July 2019 13:57
> To: Paul Durrant
> Cc: xen-devel (xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org)
>
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] per-domain passthrough/iommu options
>
> On 26.07.2019 14:29, Paul Durrant wrote:
> &
On 26.07.2019 14:29, Paul Durrant wrote:
>I sent a previous email [1] about enabling use of the IOMMU on a
> per-domain basis and am now a reasonable way into my patch series, which also
> allows for IOMMU option-setting (specifically shared EPT use) on a per-domain
> basis too. Before I pos
Hi,
I sent a previous email [1] about enabling use of the IOMMU on a per-domain
basis and am now a reasonable way into my patch series, which also allows for
IOMMU option-setting (specifically shared EPT use) on a per-domain basis too.
Before I post v1 I'd like to get some opinion on the what
