>>> On 11.10.18 at 18:33, wrote:
>
>> On Oct 11, 2018, at 5:15 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>
> On 11.10.18 at 17:54, wrote:
>>
On Oct 2, 2018, at 1:47 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 02.10.18 at 12:51, wrote:
> This doesn't behave like real hardware, and definitely d
> On Oct 2, 2018, at 11:51 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>
> On 02/10/18 11:36, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 25.09.18 at 16:14, wrote:
>>> Emulation requiring device model assistance uses a form of instruction
>>> re-execution, assuming that the second (and any further) pass takes
>>> exactly the sa
> On Oct 11, 2018, at 5:15 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
On 11.10.18 at 17:54, wrote:
>
>>> On Oct 2, 2018, at 1:47 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>
>> On 02.10.18 at 12:51, wrote:
>>>
This doesn't behave like real hardware, and definitely doesn't behave as
named - "struct hvmemul
>>> On 11.10.18 at 17:54, wrote:
>> On Oct 2, 2018, at 1:47 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>
> On 02.10.18 at 12:51, wrote:
>>
>>> This doesn't behave like real hardware, and definitely doesn't behave as
>>> named - "struct hvmemul_cache" is simply false. If it were named
>>> hvmemul_psc (or so
> On Oct 2, 2018, at 1:47 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
On 02.10.18 at 12:51, wrote:
>
>> This doesn't behave like real hardware, and definitely doesn't behave as
>> named - "struct hvmemul_cache" is simply false. If it were named
>> hvmemul_psc (or some other variation on Paging Structure Ca
>>> On 02.10.18 at 12:51, wrote:
> On 02/10/18 11:36, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 25.09.18 at 16:14, wrote:
>>> Emulation requiring device model assistance uses a form of instruction
>>> re-execution, assuming that the second (and any further) pass takes
>>> exactly the same path. This is a valid
>>> On 02.10.18 at 12:51, wrote:
> On 02/10/18 11:36, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 25.09.18 at 16:14, wrote:
>>> Emulation requiring device model assistance uses a form of instruction
>>> re-execution, assuming that the second (and any further) pass takes
>>> exactly the same path. This is a valid
On 02/10/18 11:36, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 25.09.18 at 16:14, wrote:
>> Emulation requiring device model assistance uses a form of instruction
>> re-execution, assuming that the second (and any further) pass takes
>> exactly the same path. This is a valid assumption as far as use of CPU
>> regi
>>> On 25.09.18 at 16:14, wrote:
> Emulation requiring device model assistance uses a form of instruction
> re-execution, assuming that the second (and any further) pass takes
> exactly the same path. This is a valid assumption as far as use of CPU
> registers goes (as those can't change without a
