Re: [Xen-devel] Ping: [PATCH 0/5] x86: more power-efficient CPU parking

2019-04-03 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 03.04.19 at 16:44, wrote: > On 03/04/2019 13:43, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 03.04.19 at 13:14, wrote: >>> On 03/04/2019 11:12, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> On 01.08.18 at 16:22, wrote: > When putting CPUs to sleep permanently, we should try to put them into > the most power conserv

Re: [Xen-devel] Ping: [PATCH 0/5] x86: more power-efficient CPU parking

2019-04-03 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 03/04/2019 13:43, Jan Beulich wrote: On 03.04.19 at 13:14, wrote: >> On 03/04/2019 11:12, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 01.08.18 at 16:22, wrote: When putting CPUs to sleep permanently, we should try to put them into the most power conserving state possible. For now it is unclear

Re: [Xen-devel] Ping: [PATCH 0/5] x86: more power-efficient CPU parking

2019-04-03 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 03.04.19 at 13:14, wrote: > On 03/04/2019 11:12, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 01.08.18 at 16:22, wrote: >>> When putting CPUs to sleep permanently, we should try to put them into >>> the most power conserving state possible. For now it is unclear whether, >>> especially in a deep C-state, t

Re: [Xen-devel] Ping: [PATCH 0/5] x86: more power-efficient CPU parking

2019-04-03 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 03/04/2019 11:12, Jan Beulich wrote: On 01.08.18 at 16:22, wrote: >> When putting CPUs to sleep permanently, we should try to put them into >> the most power conserving state possible. For now it is unclear whether, >> especially in a deep C-state, the P-state also matters, so this series

[Xen-devel] Ping: [PATCH 0/5] x86: more power-efficient CPU parking

2019-04-03 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 01.08.18 at 16:22, wrote: > When putting CPUs to sleep permanently, we should try to put them into > the most power conserving state possible. For now it is unclear whether, > especially in a deep C-state, the P-state also matters, so this series only > arranges for the C-state side of thin

Re: [Xen-devel] Ping: [PATCH 0/5] x86: more power-efficient CPU parking

2018-08-30 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 29.08.18 at 19:01, wrote: > On 29/08/18 08:08, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 01.08.18 at 16:22, wrote: >>> When putting CPUs to sleep permanently, we should try to put them into >>> the most power conserving state possible. For now it is unclear whether, >>> especially in a deep C-state, the

Re: [Xen-devel] Ping: [PATCH 0/5] x86: more power-efficient CPU parking

2018-08-29 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 29/08/18 08:08, Jan Beulich wrote: On 01.08.18 at 16:22, wrote: >> When putting CPUs to sleep permanently, we should try to put them into >> the most power conserving state possible. For now it is unclear whether, >> especially in a deep C-state, the P-state also matters, so this series on

[Xen-devel] Ping: [PATCH 0/5] x86: more power-efficient CPU parking

2018-08-29 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 01.08.18 at 16:22, wrote: > When putting CPUs to sleep permanently, we should try to put them into > the most power conserving state possible. For now it is unclear whether, > especially in a deep C-state, the P-state also matters, so this series only > arranges for the C-state side of thin