> On 1. Aug 2019, at 18:27, Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 3:27 AM Elnikety, Eslam wrote:
>>
>> But t3 is not Xen.
>>
> That's a good reason to not use it. :-) I picked it to be a small,
> cheap instance that would represent a potential use case. Is the t2
> family Xen? Or the
On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 3:27 AM Elnikety, Eslam wrote:
>
> But t3 is not Xen.
>
That's a good reason to not use it. :-) I picked it to be a small,
cheap instance that would represent a potential use case. Is the t2
family Xen? Or the m5? I think it makes sense to write the requirement
as "the laste
> On 29. Jul 2019, at 20:58, Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 7:16 PM Adam Williamson
> wrote:
>>
>> OK, so, to move forward with this (and looping in cloud list): does
>> someone want to propose a set (ideally small - 2 would be great, one
>> Xen and one non-Xen, if we can cover
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 7:16 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> OK, so, to move forward with this (and looping in cloud list): does
> someone want to propose a set (ideally small - 2 would be great, one
> Xen and one non-Xen, if we can cover most common usages that way!) of
> EC2 instance types we shou
On Thu, 2019-07-11 at 14:19 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-07-11 at 21:43 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2019-07-08 at 09:11 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > > It's worth noting that at least part of the justification for the
> > > > criterion in the first place was tha
> On 12 Jul 2019, at 13:24, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 5:50 AM David Woodhouse wrote:
>>
>>
>>> IIRC, what we have right now is a somewhat vague setup where we just
>>> have 'local', 'ec2' and 'openstack' columns. The instructions for
>>> "Amazon Web Services" just say
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 5:50 AM David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2019-07-11 at 14:19 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Yeah, that's where I was going to go next (there has already been a
> > thread about this this morning). If what we care about is that Fedora
> > boots on EC2, that's what we sh
> On Mon, 2019-07-08 at 09:11 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > It's worth noting that at least part of the justification for the
> > criterion in the first place was that Amazon was using Xen for EC2, but
> > that is no longer the case, most if not all EC2 instance types no
> > longer use Xen.
>
>
On Thu, 2019-07-11 at 14:19 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Yeah, that's where I was going to go next (there has already been a
> thread about this this morning). If what we care about is that Fedora
> boots on EC2, that's what we should have in the criteria, and what we
> should test.
While tryin
On Thu, 2019-07-11 at 21:43 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2019-07-08 at 09:11 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > It's worth noting that at least part of the justification for the
> > > criterion in the first place was that Amazon was using Xen for EC2, but
> > > that is no longer the ca
On Mon, 2019-07-08 at 09:11 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> It's worth noting that at least part of the justification for the
> criterion in the first place was that Amazon was using Xen for EC2, but
> that is no longer the case, most if not all EC2 instance types no
> longer use Xen.
I don't know
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 10:58:03AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-07-11 at 09:57 -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> > On 7/8/19 11:11 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2019-05-21 at 11:14 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > > > > > > "The release must boot successfully as Xen DomU
On Thu, 2019-07-11 at 09:57 -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> On 7/8/19 11:11 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2019-05-21 at 11:14 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > > > > > "The release must boot successfully as Xen DomU with releases
> > > > > > > providing
> > > > > > > a functional, suppor
On 7/8/19 11:11 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2019-05-21 at 11:14 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
"The release must boot successfully as Xen DomU with releases providing
a functional, supported Xen Dom0 and widely used cloud providers
utilizing Xen."
and change the 'milestone' for the test
On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 6:12 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-05-21 at 11:14 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > > > > "The release must boot successfully as Xen DomU with releases
> providing
> > > > > > a functional, supported Xen Dom0 and widely used cloud providers
> > > > > > utilizin
I am in favor of removing the Xen blocking criteria as it has not received
the testing it needs and has been a source of conflict for several releases
in the past.
Geoff Marr
IRC: coremodule
On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 10:12 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-05-21 at 11:14 -0700, Adam Willia
On Tue, 2019-05-21 at 11:14 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > > > "The release must boot successfully as Xen DomU with releases
> > > > > providing
> > > > > a functional, supported Xen Dom0 and widely used cloud providers
> > > > > utilizing Xen."
> > > > >
> > > > > and change the 'milestone'
On Mon, 2019-05-13 at 16:29 -0600, Lars Kurth wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am going to step in here with my hat as Xen Project community
> manager. We had a discussion about this issue as part of last week's
> community call. I CC'ed a number of stake-holders, which probably
> should have been on the th
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 7:45 PM Lars Kurth wrote:
> @Adam and Fedora Testing & QA:
> any views on my proposal?
> Regards
> Lars
>
Hi Lars,
thanks for your reply. Adam was on a long vacation and he's probably the
most qualified person to reply to you, sorry for not telling you sooner.
Adam is now
@Adam and Fedora Testing & QA:
any views on my proposal?
Regards
Lars
> On 13 May 2019, at 16:29, Lars Kurth wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am going to step in here with my hat as Xen Project community
> manager. We had a discussion about this issue as part of last week's
> community call. I CC'ed a
On Tue, 14 May 2019, Steven Haigh wrote:
> The final fix would be figuring out why pygrub currently boots the *second*
> entry in the resulting grub.cfg - unlike how F29 worked. This may be either a
> fix on the grub2-mkconfig or pygrub side - I'm not quite sure yet. This would
> likely restore fu
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 11:50 PM, Lars Kurth
wrote:
Apologies,
I mixed up some references
Lars
...
[A2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264103
[B1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1703700
Bug B1 here was lodged by myself. There is also a post to xen-devel
titled
Apologies,
I mixed up some references
Lars
> On 13 May 2019, at 16:29, Lars Kurth wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am going to step in here with my hat as Xen Project community
> manager. We had a discussion about this issue as part of last week's
> community call. I CC'ed a number of stake-holders, wh
Hi all,
I am going to step in here with my hat as Xen Project community
manager. We had a discussion about this issue as part of last week's
community call. I CC'ed a number of stake-holders, which probably
should have been on the thread such as ITL (which builds QubesOS
on top of Fedora) and Mich
I have not heard that Peter moved to the Oracle ;-))), so, changing his
address back to RedHat one. And dropping Fedora testing mailing list
address because I do not have permissions to send to it...
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 10:51:47AM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> Sorry for top posting...
>
> FYI,
Sorry for top posting...
FYI, I am on vacation right now. I will be back next week. So, if it is
not urgent I will explain all the stuff and update relevant bug at the
beginning of next week. Sorry for delay.
Daniel
On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 12:44:37PM +1000, Steven Haigh wrote:
> (and sending to
(and sending to the list this time due to Geary being rather
featureless mail client)
As one of those being caught by regressions upgrading F29 to F30 under
Xen DomU's, I think this is a bad idea.
It shows that it wasn't tested, because it doesn't work. To me, this
exposes weaknesses in the
Since F24, I haven't seen or heard of anyone who uses Xen over KVM anywhere
other than this thread... I'm +1 for making this test an "Optional" one.
Geoff Marr
IRC: coremodule
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 10:33 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 13:19 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
Yup +1 from my side too. Xen is hardly tested since a lot of time.
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 10:07 PM Geoffrey Marr wrote:
> Since F24, I haven't seen or heard of anyone who uses Xen over KVM
> anywhere other than this thread... I'm +1 for making this test an
> "Optional" one.
>
> Geoff Marr
> IRC
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 10:22:13PM +0530, Sumantro Mukherjee wrote:
> Yup +1 from my side too. Xen is hardly tested since a lot of time.
Hi!
And that is thanks to one of the GRUB2 bugs that needs some love
from Peter Jones.
As without that bug being fixed - it is very difficult to test it - as y
On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 13:19 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 15:59 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > > I would prefer for it to remain as it is.
> > >
> > > This is only practical if it's going to be tested, and tested regularly
> > > - not *only* on the final release
31 matches
Mail list logo
