Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 128240: regressions - FAIL

2018-10-02 Thread Dario Faggioli
On Tue, 2018-10-02 at 11:06 +0100, George Dunlap wrote: > On 10/01/2018 06:58 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > > > George, let me know if you're working on a fix already, or if I > > should > > do that myself. > > I reverted the credit2 default; but really we need to have a design > discussion about

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 128240: regressions - FAIL

2018-10-02 Thread George Dunlap
On 10/01/2018 06:58 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote: > On Mon, 2018-10-01 at 18:07 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote: >> On 01/10/2018 17:48, George Dunlap wrote: >>> On 10/01/2018 04:40 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote: On 01/10/18 16:35, Wei Liu wrote: >> Wait, the migration code reads the scheduler parameters

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 128240: regressions - FAIL

2018-10-02 Thread Dario Faggioli
On Tue, 2018-10-02 at 10:36 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > > On 02.10.18 at 11:24, wrote: > > > No. See Jürgen's response. The default scheduler (irrespective of > whether it was chosen via command line option) should not matter. > Any means to force a non-default scheduler (and it indeed looks

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 128240: regressions - FAIL

2018-10-02 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 02.10.18 at 11:24, wrote: > On Tue, 2018-10-02 at 09:29 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: >> > > > On 01.10.18 at 18:07, wrote: >> > >> > We should ignore a mismatch of the scheduler. Failures when setting >> > parameters for a matching scheduler should not be ignored IMO. >> >> Well, depends on

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 128240: regressions - FAIL

2018-10-02 Thread Dario Faggioli
On Tue, 2018-10-02 at 09:29 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > > On 01.10.18 at 18:07, wrote: > > > > We should ignore a mismatch of the scheduler. Failures when setting > > parameters for a matching scheduler should not be ignored IMO. > > Well, depends on whether the scheduler was explicitly chos

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 128240: regressions - FAIL

2018-10-02 Thread Juergen Gross
On 02/10/2018 10:29, Jan Beulich wrote: On 01.10.18 at 18:07, wrote: >> On 01/10/2018 17:48, George Dunlap wrote: >>> On 10/01/2018 04:40 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote: If there isn't an obvious fix, then the switch of default scheduler needs reverting until there is a fix present. This

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 128240: regressions - FAIL

2018-10-02 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 01.10.18 at 18:07, wrote: > On 01/10/2018 17:48, George Dunlap wrote: >> On 10/01/2018 04:40 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote: >>> If there isn't an obvious fix, then the switch of default scheduler >>> needs reverting until there is a fix present. This is currently >>> blocking master. >> >> Agre

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 128240: regressions - FAIL

2018-10-01 Thread Dario Faggioli
On Mon, 2018-10-01 at 16:35 +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 04:19:07PM +0100, George Dunlap wrote: > > Wait, the migration code reads the scheduler parameters -- even if > > these > > have not been explicitly set by the admin -- and sends them along > > with > > the migration stream

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 128240: regressions - FAIL

2018-10-01 Thread Dario Faggioli
On Mon, 2018-10-01 at 18:07 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 01/10/2018 17:48, George Dunlap wrote: > > On 10/01/2018 04:40 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote: > > > On 01/10/18 16:35, Wei Liu wrote: > > > > > Wait, the migration code reads the scheduler parameters -- > > > > > even if these > > > > > have no

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 128240: regressions - FAIL

2018-10-01 Thread Juergen Gross
On 01/10/2018 17:48, George Dunlap wrote: > On 10/01/2018 04:40 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> On 01/10/18 16:35, Wei Liu wrote: >>> On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 04:19:07PM +0100, George Dunlap wrote: On 10/01/2018 04:17 PM, Wei Liu wrote: > On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 09:10:25AM -0600, Jan Beulich wr

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 128240: regressions - FAIL

2018-10-01 Thread George Dunlap
On 10/01/2018 04:40 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 01/10/18 16:35, Wei Liu wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 04:19:07PM +0100, George Dunlap wrote: >>> On 10/01/2018 04:17 PM, Wei Liu wrote: On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 09:10:25AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: On 01.10.18 at 16:33, wrote:

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 128240: regressions - FAIL

2018-10-01 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 01/10/18 16:35, Wei Liu wrote: > On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 04:19:07PM +0100, George Dunlap wrote: >> On 10/01/2018 04:17 PM, Wei Liu wrote: >>> On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 09:10:25AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> On 01.10.18 at 16:33, wrote: > On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 03:04:02AM -0600, Jan Beu

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 128240: regressions - FAIL

2018-10-01 Thread Wei Liu
On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 04:19:07PM +0100, George Dunlap wrote: > On 10/01/2018 04:17 PM, Wei Liu wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 09:10:25AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > > On 01.10.18 at 16:33, wrote: > >>> On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 03:04:02AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 30.09.18 at

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 128240: regressions - FAIL

2018-10-01 Thread George Dunlap
On 10/01/2018 04:17 PM, Wei Liu wrote: > On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 09:10:25AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 01.10.18 at 16:33, wrote: >>> On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 03:04:02AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> On 30.09.18 at 23:59, wrote: > flight 128240 xen-unstable real [real] > http://

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 128240: regressions - FAIL

2018-10-01 Thread Wei Liu
On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 09:10:25AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 01.10.18 at 16:33, wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 03:04:02AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> >>> On 30.09.18 at 23:59, wrote: > >> > flight 128240 xen-unstable real [real] > >> > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/l

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 128240: regressions - FAIL

2018-10-01 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 01.10.18 at 16:33, wrote: > On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 03:04:02AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: >> >>> On 30.09.18 at 23:59, wrote: >> > flight 128240 xen-unstable real [real] >> > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/128240/ >> > >> > Regressions :-( >> > >> > Tests which did not

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 128240: regressions - FAIL

2018-10-01 Thread Wei Liu
On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 03:04:02AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 30.09.18 at 23:59, wrote: > > flight 128240 xen-unstable real [real] > > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/128240/ > > > > Regressions :-( > > > > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, > > including tes

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 128240: regressions - FAIL

2018-10-01 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 30.09.18 at 23:59, wrote: > flight 128240 xen-unstable real [real] > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/128240/ > > Regressions :-( > > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, > including tests which could not be run: > test-amd64-amd64-migrupgrade 22 guest-migrate/s

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 128240: regressions - FAIL

2018-09-30 Thread osstest service owner
flight 128240 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/128240/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-migrupgrade 22 guest-migrate/src_host/dst_host fail REGR. vs. 128084 test-amd64