On 09.09.2019 07:52, Chao Gao wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 02:35:06PM +0800, Chao Gao wrote:
>>> Doing the actual ucode update inside an NMI handler seems rather risky
>>> to me. Even if Ashok confirmed it would not be an issue on past and
>>> current Intel CPUs - what about future ones, or one
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 02:35:06PM +0800, Chao Gao wrote:
>On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 02:11:10PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>On 27.08.2019 06:52, Chao Gao wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 04:07:59PM +0800, Chao Gao wrote:
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 09:46:37AM +0100, Sergey Dyasli wrote:
> On 1
On 30.08.2019 08:33, Chao Gao wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 02:22:47PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 19.08.2019 03:25, Chao Gao wrote:
>>> @@ -481,12 +478,28 @@ static int do_microcode_update(void *patch)
>>> return ret;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static int microcode_nmi_callback(const struct cpu
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 02:11:10PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>On 27.08.2019 06:52, Chao Gao wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 04:07:59PM +0800, Chao Gao wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 09:46:37AM +0100, Sergey Dyasli wrote:
On 19/08/2019 02:25, Chao Gao wrote:
> register an nmi callback
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 02:22:47PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>On 19.08.2019 03:25, Chao Gao wrote:
>> @@ -481,12 +478,28 @@ static int do_microcode_update(void *patch)
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> +static int microcode_nmi_callback(const struct cpu_user_regs *regs, int cpu)
>> +{
>> +/* Th
On 19.08.2019 03:25, Chao Gao wrote:
> @@ -481,12 +478,28 @@ static int do_microcode_update(void *patch)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int microcode_nmi_callback(const struct cpu_user_regs *regs, int cpu)
> +{
> +/* The first thread of a core is to load an update. Don't block it. */
> +
On 27.08.2019 06:52, Chao Gao wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 04:07:59PM +0800, Chao Gao wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 09:46:37AM +0100, Sergey Dyasli wrote:
>>> On 19/08/2019 02:25, Chao Gao wrote:
register an nmi callback. And this callback does busy-loop on threads
which are waiti
On 27/08/2019 05:52, Chao Gao wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 04:07:59PM +0800, Chao Gao wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 09:46:37AM +0100, Sergey Dyasli wrote:
>>> On 19/08/2019 02:25, Chao Gao wrote:
register an nmi callback. And this callback does busy-loop on threads
which are waiti
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 04:07:59PM +0800, Chao Gao wrote:
>On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 09:46:37AM +0100, Sergey Dyasli wrote:
>>On 19/08/2019 02:25, Chao Gao wrote:
>>> register an nmi callback. And this callback does busy-loop on threads
>>> which are waiting for loading completion. Control threads se
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 09:46:37AM +0100, Sergey Dyasli wrote:
>On 19/08/2019 02:25, Chao Gao wrote:
>> register an nmi callback. And this callback does busy-loop on threads
>> which are waiting for loading completion. Control threads send NMI to
>> slave threads to prevent NMI acceptance during uc
On 19/08/2019 02:25, Chao Gao wrote:
> register an nmi callback. And this callback does busy-loop on threads
> which are waiting for loading completion. Control threads send NMI to
> slave threads to prevent NMI acceptance during ucode loading.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Gao
> ---
> Changes in v9:
>
register an nmi callback. And this callback does busy-loop on threads
which are waiting for loading completion. Control threads send NMI to
slave threads to prevent NMI acceptance during ucode loading.
Signed-off-by: Chao Gao
---
Changes in v9:
- control threads send NMI to all other threads. Sl
12 matches
Mail list logo
