Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 40/50] x86emul: support remaining AVX512_VBMI2 insns

2019-06-19 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 15/03/2019 11:02, Jan Beulich wrote: > As in a few cases before, since the insns here and in particular their > memory access patterns follow the usual scheme, I didn't think it was > necessary to add a contrived test specifically for them, beyond the > Disp8 scaling one. > > Signed-off-by: Jan

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 40/50] x86emul: support remaining AVX512_VBMI2 insns

2019-03-15 Thread Jan Beulich
As in a few cases before, since the insns here and in particular their memory access patterns follow the usual scheme, I didn't think it was necessary to add a contrived test specifically for them, beyond the Disp8 scaling one. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich --- v7: Re-base over change earlier in the