On 15/03/2019 11:02, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Once again take the liberty and also correct the (public interface) name
> of the AVX512_IFMA feature flag to match the SDM, on the assumption that
> no external consumer has actually been using that flag so far.
>
> As in a few cases before, since the insn
Once again take the liberty and also correct the (public interface) name
of the AVX512_IFMA feature flag to match the SDM, on the assumption that
no external consumer has actually been using that flag so far.
As in a few cases before, since the insns here and in particular their
memory access patt
