On 15/03/2019 11:01, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Also add testing of ones support for which was added before. Sadly gcc's
> command line option naming is not in line with Intel's naming of the
> feature, which makes it necessary to mis-name things in the test harness.
>
> Since the only new insn here and
Also add testing of ones support for which was added before. Sadly gcc's
command line option naming is not in line with Intel's naming of the
feature, which makes it necessary to mis-name things in the test harness.
Since the only new insn here and in particular its memory access pattern
follows t
