On 25.03.2020 21:58, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 24/03/2020 12:29, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Note that SDM revision 070 doesn't specify exception behavior for
>> ModRM.mod == 0b11; assuming #UD here.
>
> Didn't I confirm this behaviour for you last time around?
Iirc you did, but the SDM still hasn't ch
On 24/03/2020 12:29, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Note that SDM revision 070 doesn't specify exception behavior for
> ModRM.mod == 0b11; assuming #UD here.
Didn't I confirm this behaviour for you last time around?
> @@ -10075,6 +10079,14 @@ x86_emulate(
> : "0" ((uint32_t)src
Note that SDM revision 070 doesn't specify exception behavior for
ModRM.mod == 0b11; assuming #UD here.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
---
v4: Split MOVDIRI and MOVDIR64B and move this one ahead. Re-base.
v3: Update description.
--- a/tools/tests/x86_emulator/test_x86_emulator.c
+++ b/tools/tests/x8
