On 02.07.2019 11:01, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 02.07.2019 09:58, Alexandru Stefan ISAILA wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 01.07.2019 18:53, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 01.07.2019 17:36, Alexandru Stefan ISAILA wrote:
On 01.07.2019 17:55, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 01.07.2019 16:45, Alexandru Stefan ISAILA wr
On 02.07.2019 09:58, Alexandru Stefan ISAILA wrote:
>
>
> On 01.07.2019 18:53, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 01.07.2019 17:36, Alexandru Stefan ISAILA wrote:
>>> On 01.07.2019 17:55, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 01.07.2019 16:45, Alexandru Stefan ISAILA wrote:
> On 01.07.2019 16:13, Jan Beulich wrot
On 01.07.2019 18:53, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 01.07.2019 17:36, Alexandru Stefan ISAILA wrote:
>> On 01.07.2019 17:55, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 01.07.2019 16:45, Alexandru Stefan ISAILA wrote:
On 01.07.2019 16:13, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 04.06.19 at 13:49, wrote:
>> +if ( !re
On 01.07.2019 17:36, Alexandru Stefan ISAILA wrote:
> On 01.07.2019 17:55, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 01.07.2019 16:45, Alexandru Stefan ISAILA wrote:
>>> On 01.07.2019 16:13, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 04.06.19 at 13:49, wrote:
> +if ( !req.u.mem_access.flags )
> +return fals
On 01.07.2019 17:13, Razvan Cojocaru wrote:
> On 7/1/19 5:45 PM, Alexandru Stefan ISAILA wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 01.07.2019 16:13, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 04.06.19 at 13:49, wrote:
This patch aims to have mem access vm events sent from the emulator.
This is useful where we want to only e
On 01.07.2019 17:55, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 01.07.2019 16:45, Alexandru Stefan ISAILA wrote:
>> On 01.07.2019 16:13, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 04.06.19 at 13:49, wrote:
+if ( !send_event || !pfec )
+return false;
>>>
>>> I think I've said before that the !pfec part need
On 7/1/19 5:45 PM, Alexandru Stefan ISAILA wrote:
On 01.07.2019 16:13, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 04.06.19 at 13:49, wrote:
This patch aims to have mem access vm events sent from the emulator.
This is useful where we want to only emulate a page walk without
checking the EPT, but we still want to
On 01.07.2019 16:45, Alexandru Stefan ISAILA wrote:
> On 01.07.2019 16:13, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 04.06.19 at 13:49, wrote:
>>> +if ( !send_event || !pfec )
>>> +return false;
>>
>> I think I've said before that the !pfec part need an explanation (in
>> a comment). Without such an
On 01.07.2019 16:13, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 04.06.19 at 13:49, wrote:
>> This patch aims to have mem access vm events sent from the emulator.
>> This is useful where we want to only emulate a page walk without
>> checking the EPT, but we still want to check the EPT when emulating
>> the inst
>>> On 04.06.19 at 13:49, wrote:
> This patch aims to have mem access vm events sent from the emulator.
> This is useful where we want to only emulate a page walk without
> checking the EPT, but we still want to check the EPT when emulating
> the instruction that caused the page walk. In this case
Hi all,
Any remarks on the patch at hand are appreciated.
Thanks,
Alex
On 04.06.2019 14:49, Alexandru Stefan ISAILA wrote:
> This patch aims to have mem access vm events sent from the emulator.
> This is useful where we want to only emulate a page walk without
> checking the EPT, but we still wa
> -Original Message-
> From: Alexandru Stefan ISAILA [mailto:aisa...@bitdefender.com]
> Sent: 04 June 2019 12:50
> To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
> Cc: Paul Durrant ; jbeul...@suse.com; Andrew Cooper
> ; w...@xen.org; Roger Pau Monne
> ;
> boris.ostrov...@oracle.com; suravee.suthikulpa
This patch aims to have mem access vm events sent from the emulator.
This is useful where we want to only emulate a page walk without
checking the EPT, but we still want to check the EPT when emulating
the instruction that caused the page walk. In this case, the original
EPT fault is caused by the
13 matches
Mail list logo
