>>> On 23.01.18 at 13:56, wrote:
> I did below TEMP patch, please help me check whther this patch meet your
> requirements, many thanks!
Looks reasonable at the first glance, provided you add a proper
fall-through annotation to the new fall-through.
Jan
___
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 07:13:21AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 03.01.18 at 09:26, wrote:
> > The previous aes insns only support legacy and AVX128.
> > Icelake added AVX256 support.
>
> Same remark here as for the pclmulqdq patch.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Yang Zhong
> > ---
>
> Please provi
>>> On 03.01.18 at 09:26, wrote:
> The previous aes insns only support legacy and AVX128.
> Icelake added AVX256 support.
Same remark here as for the pclmulqdq patch.
> Signed-off-by: Yang Zhong
> ---
Please provide a brief list of changes at this spot in each patch.
> @@ -7336,17 +7337,23 @@
The previous aes insns only support legacy and AVX128.
Icelake added AVX256 support.
Signed-off-by: Yang Zhong
---
xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c | 17 -
xen/include/asm-x86/cpufeature.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/arc