>>> On 02.07.18 at 18:22, wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 09:09:31AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 02.07.18 at 16:54, wrote:
>> > Ping?
>>
>> I don't understand: There's no open question in the quoted mail.
>
> It's more of a refute of your argument about assert of level triggered
> inte
On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 09:09:31AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 02.07.18 at 16:54, wrote:
> > Ping?
>
> I don't understand: There's no open question in the quoted mail.
It's more of a refute of your argument about assert of level triggered
interrupts not being meaningful if the interrupt i
>>> On 02.07.18 at 16:54, wrote:
> Ping?
I don't understand: There's no open question in the quoted mail.
Jan
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 01:19:19PM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 08:23:02AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> > >>> On 08.06.18 at 17:07, wrote:
>> > > @@ -316,
Ping?
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 01:19:19PM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 08:23:02AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > >>> On 08.06.18 at 17:07, wrote:
> > > @@ -316,7 +317,9 @@ int pt_update_irq(struct vcpu *v)
> > > if ( pt->pending_intr_nr )
> > > {
> > >
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 08:23:02AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 08.06.18 at 17:07, wrote:
> > @@ -316,7 +317,9 @@ int pt_update_irq(struct vcpu *v)
> > if ( pt->pending_intr_nr )
> > {
> > /* RTC code takes care of disabling the timer itself. */
> > -
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 09:53:26AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 22.06.18 at 17:24, wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 08:23:02AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 08.06.18 at 17:07, wrote:
> >> > @@ -316,7 +317,9 @@ int pt_update_irq(struct vcpu *v)
> >> > if ( pt->pending_intr
>>> On 22.06.18 at 17:24, wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 08:23:02AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 08.06.18 at 17:07, wrote:
>> > @@ -316,7 +317,9 @@ int pt_update_irq(struct vcpu *v)
>> > if ( pt->pending_intr_nr )
>> > {
>> > /* RTC code takes care of disab
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 08:23:02AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 08.06.18 at 17:07, wrote:
> > @@ -316,7 +317,9 @@ int pt_update_irq(struct vcpu *v)
> > if ( pt->pending_intr_nr )
> > {
> > /* RTC code takes care of disabling the timer itself. */
> > -
>>> On 08.06.18 at 17:07, wrote:
> @@ -316,7 +317,9 @@ int pt_update_irq(struct vcpu *v)
> if ( pt->pending_intr_nr )
> {
> /* RTC code takes care of disabling the timer itself. */
> -if ( (pt->irq != RTC_IRQ || !pt->priv) && pt_irq_masked(pt) )
> +
Level trigger interrupts will be asserted regardless of whether the
interrupt is masked, and thus the callback will also be executed.
Add a new 'level' parameter to create_periodic_time in order to create
level triggered timers.
Note that none of the current users of vpt are switched to use level
10 matches
Mail list logo
