On 03.09.2019 12:18, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 03/09/2019 10:37, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> The only place we'd expect the insn to be sensibly used is in
>> (virtualization unaware) firmware.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Andrew Cooper
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
>> ---
>> v3: New.
>>
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hv
On 03/09/2019 10:37, Jan Beulich wrote:
> The only place we'd expect the insn to be sensibly used is in
> (virtualization unaware) firmware.
>
> Suggested-by: Andrew Cooper
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
> ---
> v3: New.
>
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c
> @@ -
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Beulich
> Sent: 03 September 2019 10:38
> To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
> Cc: Andrew Cooper ; Paul Durrant
> ; Roger Pau Monne
> ; Wei Liu
> Subject: [PATCH v3 2/8] x86/HVM: ignore guest INVD uses
>
> The only place we'd expect the insn to be sensib
The only place we'd expect the insn to be sensibly used is in
(virtualization unaware) firmware.
Suggested-by: Andrew Cooper
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
---
v3: New.
--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c
@@ -2210,11 +2210,18 @@ static int hvmemul_cache_op(
